Skip to Content Skip to Search Go to Top Navigation Go to Side Menu


Republican cry-baby John Boehner calls Barack “chicken shit”


Friday, October 31, 2008 - 7:02 pm (EST)
By John LaCroix

He’s got to be kidding. From Yahoo:

“Now, listen, I’ve voted ‘present’ two or three times in my entire 25-year political career, where there might have been a conflict of interest and I didn’t feel like I should vote,” Boehner said. “In Congress, we have a red button, a green button and a yellow button, alright. Green means ‘yes,’ red means ‘no,’ and yellow means you’re a chicken shit.

Real tough words from a dude who’s cried on the senate floor at least twice.

YouTube Preview Image

I think he’s actually drunk too in this video. I get the drunkemos once in a while too.

TAGS: Barack Obama, Congress, cry baby, john boehner, Republican, senate, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

Cindy McCain: Attack Dog


Wednesday, October 8, 2008 - 9:37 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

So, most pundits think that Obama beat McCain in last night’s debate. That clearly didn’t sit well with the McCain campaign, so they unleashed Cindy McCain, who could be the future First Lady. Here’s a gem from her speech today:

I’m proud of my sons, but let me tell you, the day that Senator Obama decided to cast a vote to not fund my son when he was serving sent a cold chill through my body.

I’m curious to know if Cindy felt that same chill when her husband also voted not to fund the troops. From CNN:

The vote Mrs. McCain is referencing came in May of 2007, when Obama was one of 14 senators who voted against a war-spending plan that would have provided emergency funds for American troops overseas. He, like many Democrats, was pushing for an end to the war in Iraq, and the legislation included no provisions for that. Before that vote, Obama did support and vote for a funding proposal that included a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq — a troop funding bill McCain opposed.

This line of attack from the McCain campaign is getting ridiculous, mostly because they’ve been called out on it so many times. The point is a simple one: Obama voted against one funding bill that didn’t have a timeline, and McCain voted against one that had a timeline. Period. Neither guy opposes funding the troops. Their disagreement was over the timeline. Of course, with Obama surging in the polls, don’t expect to hear McCain ditch his dishonest statements on this topic.

McCain loves to talk about how he’s going to take care of veterans and he knows how to do that because of his service. Well, the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America released a report yesterday grading members of Congress, including McCain and Obama, on how they voted on 22 key Veterans issues that the IAVA supported. McCain got a “D,” while Obama and Biden both got a “B.”

TAGS: attack, bill, Boston, Campaign, Congress, debate, dog, ep, Iraq, mccain, NATO, obama, political, Politics, Poll, polls, pundits, timeline, Vice, war

RELATED POSTS:

2nd Presidential Debate


Wednesday, October 8, 2008 - 12:16 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

The snap polls are out: The CNN poll has Obama winning 54%-30%, and the CBS poll gives it to Obama 40%-26%.

Overall, I think both McCain and Obama did fine, but I’d give it to Obama because McCain needed a convincing win after falling behind noticeably in the polls in recent weeks, including in many of the swing states. McCain’s campaign has turned decidedly negative, and it’ll stay that way for the next four weeks, as he tries to question Obama’s patriotism and character. I’m not sure McCain can go back to the well a second time on this stuff, and it makes him look even smaller when people are worried about the economy and their retirement savings. Tonight, though, McCain didn’t delve into character attacks, but he did have a weird moment when he referred to Obama as “that one.” Is that a continuation of the contempt he showed for Obama in the first debate?

McCain was clearly more comfortable on foreign policy than on the domestic issues, and he continued to lie about Obama’s tax and health care plans. McCain rambled and was all over the map on the domestic portion, and that’s not a good thing when most people rate the economy as their number one issue. McCain also needs to cut out the jokes. He’s just not funny, as evidenced by this exchange with Brokaw:

Brokaw asks who could be the next Hank Paulson. Who would the candidates choose as Treasury Secretary? McCain takes a weird swipe: “Not you, Tom.” Awkward, uncomprehending laughter.

Obama had one big gaffe tonight, and that was when he talked about health care. He was explaining how McCain’s plan of letting people cross state lines to get the cheapest plan wasn’t a solution, because insurance companies would just move to the state that had the fewest regulations and consumer protections. Then, he said this:

That’s how in banking it works. Everybody goes to Delaware, because they’ve got very — pretty loose laws when it comes to things like credit cards. And in that situation, what happens is, is that the protections you have, the consumer protections that you need, you’re not going to have available to you.

Whoops. Did he forget that Biden’s his running mate?

Other than that, I thought Obama was calm, cool, and collected, similar to the first debate. McCain was better than in the first debate, but he needed a win to turn the tide of opinion, and he wasn’t able to do that tonight.

There’s still plenty of time left, of course, so expect McCain to ratchet up the negative attacks. Oh, and McCain’s plan to buy up mortgages? Well, the FHA has a $300 billion program to refinance troubled mortgages, although it’s an option for the lender and not the borrower, and something very similar is in the TARP legislation that just passed Congress, so this isn’t really anything new…unless McCain is saying that he’d order the Treasury Secretary to buy up bad mortgages, in which case I can’t imagine his base will like it.

Mark Humphrey/AP

TAGS: attack, bill, Campaign, Congress, debate, economy, mccain, obama, Poll, polls, President, war

RELATED POSTS:

The Old Man and the Bulldog


Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 9:47 pm (EST)
By a.p.

So this is the caliber of discourse that we’ve come to expect from our Vice Presidential candidate, huh?  Yikes.

Watch that and tell me that you don’t experience all of the following:

a) Shock and awe that that woman might soon represent you to the world.

b) A curiosity as to when Couric hosted SNL, and how they made Fey look so convincing.

c) A strange new appreciation of George W’s eloquence.

But hey, hats off to McCain for managing to make her seem a viable candidate.  Of course, he’s had to shield her from the media almost entirely (3 interviews — if you include the new CBS interview — to Biden’s ~80 since being named VP candidate)…and they certainly fought hard and won to change the format of the VP debates so she can stick to the script.

But whatever, McCain’s been able to play the media effectively for years.  More recently, think back to how effortlessly he pandered and parlayed the impending disaster of Gustav into a non-photo op with George W at the opening of the Republican National Convention. Think I’m being too harsh?  Consider his relative non-response to the far more devastating Ike (sure, we got a couple press releases, but I didn’t see/hear of any preparation-assessment roadtrips before ol’ Ike came to Texas…).

Or how he half-succeeded this week in attempting to cancel the first presidential debate to “Put Country First” and fix the economy (nevermind that it wasn’t close to broken as far as McCain was concerned as recently as last week).

Oh, right — but he did it so he could rush back to help “break the deadlock” in Congress.  Except there wasn’t any deadlock…and no one asked for/wanted/needed his help.  I mean, what could they need from the guy who’s missed so many damn senate votes anyway?

Or wait…maybe he’s just not ready for the debate itself?

What’s important here is that McCain has taken a time out.  Kinda.  Sure, his surrogates are still out there bashing Obama (…time out?).  But this move attempts three things:

1) McCain “looks” like a leader.  Sort of.  Actually, as far as I’m concerned, he looks like a confused old man taking orders from his handlers.  But, hey, that’s just me.

2) McCain further shields Palin.  As David Letterman ranted about last night (brilliant video below), the campaign shouldn’t just stop…administrations can’t just call time out.  What should be happening here is that Palin should be out pounding the trail while McCain attends to business.  But nope — this distraction even lessens the amount of time they’ll have to keep her away from the press between now and the election.

3) McCain saves the “Foreign Policy” debate for later.  It’s clear at this point that McCain is perceived (however incorrectly) as the foreign policy guy, and Obama is the economy guy — at least according to the polls.  So, what’s bad for the foreign policy guy?  Having the foreign policy debate during an economic crisis so massive that no one cares about much else at the moment.  So, this move saves that point for later.

But, whatever — it’s all nonsense.  What Americans need right now are two things: the democratic process and leaders.

The debates are part of the democratic process.  That’s something we don’t suspend, and we don’t cancel.  Democracy first.  If not, what’s next?  Suspend the election?  Just push it back a bit?  Nope.  Remember when “not shopping” was “letting the terrorists win”…?  Right…so who wins if we “suspend our democratic process”…?

And leaders.  Not figureheads — leaders. We need people we can believe in and trust to go out and offset a national crisis like this.  Not with band aids or promises to be broken at a later date, but with real solutions that come from honest — even sometimes unattractive — answers.  That’s why Obama’s push to debate is not only the right move, it’s the patriotic one too.  In times of trouble, we need our government to stand before us and take the heat — to present solutions and to take action, but all within the context of openness and transparency.  Even if it means taking a couple hours away from the closed-door sessions.  Now more than ever, accountability matters — McCain wants none of it…and Obama, on the other hand, is ready to deliver.

Consider this: McCain’s attitude towards the debates is clear…he finds them superfluous.  He cast aside national discourse — the two candidates first chance to spar on the most important issues of our day — as though it were the finale of American Idol.  Fitting, given his American Idol running mate, but nonetheless insulting, and cynical.

In fact, McCain’s posturing proves him to be exactly what he so desperately tries to convince everyone he hasn’t become — a power-hungry figurehead who considers an active, participatory democracy just a cheap popularity contest.

That’s un-American, my friends.

YouTube Preview Image

TAGS: Campaign, Congress, contest, debate, dog, economy, election, Gustav, Interview, mccain, obama, Politics, Poll, polls, Texas, Vice, Video, war, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

McCain: Postpone VP Debate


Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 11:38 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

You can’t make this stuff up. McCain said today that he was suspending his campaign. He says he’s going to Washington to make sure that there’s a resolution on the Wall Street bailout bill. Nice of him to notice that hearings have been going on all week. I guess it wasn’t that important to go to those. Oh yeah, and he’ll still give a speech at Clinton’s Global Initiative meeting Thursday morning before he flies to DC. Priorities, naturally.

It’s laughable that McCain thinks he is so important that his appearance will suddenly lead to a resolution. All he’s going for is strategic timing, because he knows Congress is supposed to recess on Friday and needs to pass something at the latest by this weekend. He’s hoping he can take credit in case something passes, although no one knows how he will vote or what the bill will look like.

Anyway, since he’s trying to look like a leader who can work across party lines, he’s suspending his campaign, and he wants the first Presidential debate, which is this Friday, postponed if there’s no bailout deal by Friday.  Obama said “thanks but no thanks” to postponing the debate, and he said that he was still planning to debate on Friday, because it was more important than ever for the public to know what the next president’s plans are. The Presidential Debate Commission agrees with him.

Well, McCain decided to up the ante tonight. He suggested that if there’s no bailout deal, then he wouldn’t show on Friday, and he suggested that they move the first presidential debate to Oct. 2nd, which would mean that the VP debate on Oct. 2nd would be postponed. He doesn’t seem to have offered up an alternative date for the VP debate, but presumably, never would be good, since his camp clearly doesn’t want anyone to ask Palin any questions about anything.

So, not only does McCain not want to debate Obama on the ridiculous pretense that he is needed in Washington, where he hasn’t attended a single hearing this week on the financial crisis, but he doesn’t want Palin to debate Biden either. Unreal. I think McCain has officially jumped the shark now. McCain can manage to be in DC tomorrow and then in Mississippi on Friday night, unless he’s telling us he can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. Anyway, if McCain doesn’t show, then Obama can take the stage alone and do a town-hall style meeting, where the focus is on him, and who knows, maybe it’ll put Mississippi in play for him.

If McCain is willing to sit out a debate in order to look important, that’s his prerogative. It’s idiotic, but whatever. I’ve gotten used to the McCain campaign doing ridiculous stupid things at this point, so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t show on Friday.

Oh yeah, McCain also canceled his appearance on Letterman tonight. Letterman was not too pleased.

In case you’re curious about the McCain camp’s talking points on this, they accidentally sent them to reporters (hat tip: Thinkprogress):

TAGS: Campaign, Colorado, Congress, debate, idiot, mccain, obama, political, Politics, Rap

RELATED POSTS:

Good To Know


Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 12:04 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Nice to know that Bush is on the job:

The White House announced Tuesday that President Bush will postpone a scheduled fundraiser in Florida Wednesday so that he can focus on the economy, according to White House Press Secretary Dana Perino.

“The President will attend his scheduled meetings tomorrow in New York and will then return to Washington,” said Perino. “His travel to Florida has been postponed so he can concentrate fully on the situation in the financial markets and the legislation before Congress.  We will let you know if there are any further updates to the President’s schedule.”

TAGS: Bush, Congress, economy, New York, political, Travel

RELATED POSTS:

Au Revoir and RNC


Tuesday, September 9, 2008 - 3:09 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Hey all. This is my last post here at Medicine. I had a great time writing about dumb shit for the past 8 or so months. Thanks to John for giving me such a great experience in cyberspace.

I started a new site with Inigo, Jeff N, and a few others called Shiite Happens. (Below is the first post.) For now, it will be a political, arts, and culture blog with a young-ish voice, much like Medicine, but with more original video content. We’ll have a redesign and hopefully our own url soon. Please ignore the generic design for now. There won’t be any ads or commercial aspect and it will operate as a cooperative. We’re looking for writers, so give me a shout at wormetheperm {at} hotmail(.)com if you’d like to contribute.

Anyway, I’ve been out in Denver and Minneapolis for the Conventions with Inigo Gilmore, a filmmaker friend. And tomorrow we’re going moose hunting in Alaska. Despite our being robbed twice over the past two weeks, a video diary of the RNC was still able to be cut for Britain’s Channel 4. Note the shot of Inigo getting shot at by police (with rubber bullets of course) during a riot in St Paul.

 

Sarah Palin and the Re-Rise of the Republicans: An RNC Diary

1
I’m in Minneapolis, having arrived from Denver on Sunday night. With me: Inigo Gilmore, a British journalist and filmmaker who recently relocated to New York after a year’s stint in Bangkok for Channel 4 UK. That morning, we’d awoken to find our rented SUV had been broken in to, and someone had stolen the tapes from Obama’s stadium coronation. The video and still cameras were safe, but everything else—chargers, bags, tripod, batteries—gone.

So our arrival at the Republican Convention came without glory. Luckily we were staying at a nice loft in downtown St. Paul, just blocks from the Xcel Center. To forget about our Denver loss, we trekked across St. Paul’s quaint downtown looking for a bar. It’s 10m. The bars, which normally close at 2am, are supposedly open until 4am all week, but few people are out.

“The thing about St Paul is that it’s only a few hundred thousand people,” says the local who’s guiding us. “It may be the smallest city to ever hold a national Convention.”

We stop at a dive-y bar on 7th Ave, St Paul’s pedestrian mall. Neon beer signs dangle on the windows. Dart boards and pool tables are visible inside. Sitting outside, we realize 20 or so Texas delegates surround us. Clustered around two pitcher strewn tables, the Texans meet every cliche: loud, foul mouthed, cross bearing, light beer loving, and cigar chomping. They wear orthopedic shoes, unrevealing dresses, snakeskin, denim…

Our next stop was another bar filled with boozing Texas delegates. Third stop: booze, Texans. Later, we even stumble on a hotel with a sign reading, “WELCOME TEXAS DELEGATION! Crowne Plaza Hotel…”

Aside from cowboy hats and generic clothing, what else did these Texans have in common? A shockingly passionate love for Ron Paul and his post-libetarianism. Few of the Texans we meet even like John McCain.

“We support McCain because we are Republicans,” one says. “But Ron Paul is beyond partisian politics.” Then comes a detailed Paul “Revolution”-ary spiel, which I block out. Yet as Convention eve came to a close, the Paul insurgency made clear that this year’s GOP was indeed a fractured party.

2
Monday. The Twin Cities got hit by twin bombshells. First, due to Hurricane Gustav, day one of the Convention was canceled, meaning no President Bush. Second, Sarah Palin, the dark horse Alaskan Governor McCain chose for VP, has a 17-year-old pregnant daughter. Some Convention so far, eh GOP? No opening night and so much for the whole family values and no sex before marriage thing.

Around noon we hear about a anti-war protest. Venturing from the loft, on 4th Street, up a block or two, we quickly realize this is no mere protest. On a street corner stood fifty plus cops in full riot gear—helmets, bulging pads, gas masks, sticks and tazers at the ready. The police surround about twenty black-clad, masked anarchists. The anarchos are backed against a building and all have their hands up, but they yell to the few onlookers and journalists on hand.

“We did nothing!” one kid in googles yells.

“These are our streets!” they chant.

A few blocks away we spot a beat-up blue Volvo blocking a major intersection connecting St Paul to the highway that leads to Minneapolis. About two dozen cops cordon the area. Inside the car I see a black clad youth chained to the steering wheel. A big yellow forklift arrives. I hear a buzzsaw. The cops are cutting the anarchist out of the car. Once he’s been removed and arrested, the forklift removes the car and dumps it on a grass lot.

Pushing further downtown we cross paths with about two hundred “direct action” folks. They even have a trance/techno soundtrack (c/o a red wagon with a stereo and “Funk the War” signs). But the mostly black wearing bandana crew seem confused as to where they’re headed.

“C’mon, this way,” yells one.

“No, this way,” shouts another, who eventually wins out.

But the confusion ends when it comes to the marchers’ intent. These folks want nothing short of destruction of the capatilist state. I’ve witnessed a few dozen riots in my day—mostly sports related—but I’ve never seen such a long, uncontested orgy of smashed windows, popped tires, trash can flipping, road blocking, and wreckage. Inigo captures a long shot of people running up the road by a big Macy’s, where a black woman sits on a bench smiling, Macy bags at her feet. Just then, two anarchists charge from behind with a metal grate. It takes a few tries, but they smash the windows.
(more…)

TAGS: 2000, 2004, Amy Goodman, beer, BOOKS, Bush, Campaign, Congress, contest, Denver, dog, Fox News, free, GOP, Gustav, Hillary, iPod, Iraq, John McCain, kids, mccain, Music, New York, New York Times, NPR, nypd, obama, political, Politics, Pregnant, Race, Rap, Republicans, RNC, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin, Shiite, Soundtrack, spin, Sports, Texas, the Replacements, Trade, Video, war, williamsburg, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

Alaskans Against Palin


Monday, September 1, 2008 - 3:12 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

A Bloomberg news article highlights the fact that some of Palin’s Alaskan supporters, as well as the state’s major newspapers, don’t think she’s ready to be a heartbeat away from the presidency:

“She’s not qualified, she doesn’t have the judgment, to be next in line to the president of the United States,” Larry Persily, who until June worked in the governor’s Washington office as a congressional liaison, said in a phone interview.

A supporter of Palin’s campaign for governor, Jim Whitaker, the Republican mayor of Fairbanks, also questioned Palin’s readiness to serve as vice president.

“Most people would acknowledge that, regardless of her charm and good intentions, Palin is not ready for the top job,” the Fairbanks News-Miner newspaper wrote in an Aug. 29 editorial. “McCain seems to have put his political interests ahead of the nation’s when he created the possibility that she might fill it.”

The Anchorage Daily News, the state’s largest paper, noted in an editorial that Palin is enmeshed in a legislative investigation of her July 11 firing of the state’s public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan. He has since asserted that he received pressure from Palin’s family and administration to fire a state trooper involved in a contentious divorce from Palin’s sister.

TAGS: Congress, Divorce, mccain, political, Politics, Vice

RELATED POSTS:

Teddy


Monday, August 25, 2008 - 11:05 pm (EST)
By Geoff Kenyon

Chris Mathhews opened the night telling a story about a 9 year old Teddy on the night his brother Jack (JFK) won the congressional race in Mass. Matthews said that a young Kennedy raised his glass at the table and before anyone else acknowledged the elephant in the room…his eldest deceased brother…and said, “I would like to offer a toast to the brother who is not here…to Joe.”

He was then introduced by the beautiful Caroline Kennedy who seems to be able to rise above politics… or maybe I am just saying that because she is one of the few women involved in politics who is sexy. Caroline introduced “Uncle Teddy” as a Senator of not just Massachusetts, but a Sen. to all those who care about cool things such as racial equality, universal health care, and peace.

A Ken Burns viedo then featured a young Teddy claiming “As long as I have a voice in the US Senate, its going to be for the Democratic platform pledge that provides descent quality health care for all north south east and west for all America as a matter of right and not a privilege.”

The video then went on to talk to a father whose son died in 2003 in Iraq because of his unarmored Humvee …”Senator Kennedy had been a Gold Star family before I was born ….he remembers where his mother was where his father was when they came to tell them that his brother Joe was killed.” …If you count his other brothers who died for political purposes it is hard to think of a man who has paid more in the form of US Politics on the national stage.

After this stirring intro Teddy, looking the part of an old man, limped out onto the stage to pledge that he would be present in the Senate in January, his family glowing in the stands.

During the speech the cameras were fixed on a proud and enthusiastic Biden who stood and clapped at every punch line.  Especially when Teddy pronounced “Barrack Obama will be a commander in chief who understands that young Americans in uniform must never be committed to a mistake but always to a mission worthy of their bravery.”…remember Biden has a son serving in Iraq.

It was a great moment in American politics for nerds like me, and maybe the last great Kennedy moment of our lives.

 

TAGS: Congress, Iraq, NATO, nerds, obama, political, Politics, Race, Video

RELATED POSTS:

Kissinger Weighs In On Iraq


Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 1:53 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Update: 2 bottles of wine + a late-night read of Henry Kissinger = A long rant.

All Hail Henry Kissinger, master of falsehoods and ridiculous conclusions. This is a long post; most of it is just directly from Kissinger’s op-ed in the Washington Post, which happens to be a big supporter of the war in Iraq. I’m sorry the post is so long, but it will take a while to work through and rebut all of Kissinger’s ludicrous assumptions and conclusions. Also, I will try to add all the relevant links tomorrow or over the weekend, but it’s 2 AM and I’ve got an early wake-up call, so you’ll have to do with it as is for now.

(more…)

TAGS: Al-Qaeda, Barack Obama, Congress, debate, election, free, insurgents, Iran, Iraq, John McCain, mccain, NATO, obama, political, Politics, Shiite, timeline, war

RELATED POSTS:

It’s Dangerous Being A Liberal


Monday, July 28, 2008 - 10:41 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

An unemployed man named Jim Adkisson walked into a Unitarian church in Tennessee at 10 AM on Sunday morning and shot 8 people, killing two, as parishioners watched children perform ‘Annie.’ Adkisson left a note behind in his SUV that inidicated he targeted the church because of its “liberal” views.

Adkisson “stated that he had targeted the church because of its liberal teachings and his belief that all liberals should be killed because they were ruining the country, and that he felt that the Democrats had tied his country’s hands in the war on terror and they had ruined every institution in America with the aid of the major media outlets,” Investigator Steve Still wrote.

What were these hideous liberal teachings that drove Adkisson to murder innocent people?

The Unitarian-Universalist church advocates for women’s rights and gay rights and has provided sanctuary for political refugees. It also has fed the homeless and founded a chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, according to its Web site.

Damning stuff, indeed. Where did his hatred of liberals come from? The Washington Post quotes an acquaintance who said he simply hated blacks and gays and anyone different from him. The guy has clearly got a screw loose, but it’s probably not surprising that his hatred was fueled, in part, by some of his reading material (via HuffPo).

Inside the house, officers found “Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder” by radio talk show host Michael Savage, “Let Freedom Ring” by talk show host Sean Hannity, and “The O’Reilly Factor,” by television talk show host Bill O’Reilly.

Adkisson killed those people, not O’Reilly, Savage, or Hannity. Still, for guys who are always talking about how people need to take more ”personal responsibility” for their actions, they might want to tone down their hate speech, in which they equate liberals or liberalism with nazis or al-qaeda.

“I’ll tell you who should be tortured and killed at Guantanamo - every filthy Democrat in the U.S. Congress. ” - Sean Hannity

“To fight only the al-Qaida scum is to miss the terrorist network operating within our own borders… Who are these traitors? Every rotten radical left-winger in this country, that’s who.” -Michael Savage

“Finally, the ACLU — we talked about this yesterday and I — and, you know, I have to pick on the ACLU because they’re the most dangerous organization in the United States of America right now. There’s by far. There’s nobody even close to that. They’re, like, second next to Al Qaeda.” -Bill O’Reilly

 

TAGS: ACLU, Al-Qaeda, BOOKS, Congress, free, paris, political, war

RELATED POSTS:

Blackwater, Worst Organization Since SS, To End Mercenary Work


Tuesday, July 22, 2008 - 11:56 am (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Best news of the day! NYT says Blackwater to end “security contracting” “business.” Steroid sales in Iraq and North Carolina to plummet 40%…

Blackwater is giving up on the business that put them in the crosshairs of an astonishing array of parties, from the insurgents it expected to face in Iraq to the Iraqi government itself, along with the American public, Democratic members of Congress and investigators from several agencies in Washington.

Gary Jackson, Blackwater’s president, described plans for a withdrawal from security contracting in an interview published last night by The Associated Press:

In 2005 and 2006, security jobs represented more than 50 percent of the company’s business. The security business is down to about 30 percent of Blackwater revenue now and Jackson said it will go much lower.

“If I could get it down to 2 percent or 1 percent, I would go there,” he said, adding that the media have falsely portrayed much about that aspect of the company. “If you could get it right, we might stay in the business.”

This comes a day after SecDef Gates wondered, “Why have we come to rely on private contractors to provide combat or combat-related security training for our forces? Further, are we comfortable with this practice, and do we fully understand the implications in terms of quality, responsiveness and sustainability?”

TAGS: Congress, insurgents, Iraq, Practice

RELATED POSTS:

From Decider To…Compromiser?


Sunday, July 13, 2008 - 12:44 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Dan Eggen and Paul Kane have an article in the Washington Post suggesting that recent bills on war funding, and FISA, along with the US agreeing at the G8 summit to halve carbon emmissions by 2050, have given the President political victories because the White House showed the ability to compromise. I am not sure how you get to that conclusion when you actually look at the details.

On FISA, let’s just call it what it is: Democratic capitulation, seemingly because of fear that the issue would make Democrats look weak on security, Obama’s supposed soft spot, in November. Since the President agreed to follow the new law (are things this bad that Democrats consider getting the President to agree to follow the law a legistlative victory?), the Democrats gave the telecoms immunity, as long as the the telecoms could show that the Attorney General or the President had assured them that turning over Americans’ phone and web records without a warrant was perfectly legal. That’s a pretty low bar, but of course the story is that the President broke the law by conducting domestic surveillance without a warrant, and thanks to the new bill, no one will ever have to hear about how the White House used the telecoms to obtain Americans’ information without a warrant. So, there wasn’t much of a compromise here. This is pretty much the same story as last August, when the 6-month “updated” FISA bill, aka the Protect America Act, was passed. Patrick Radden Keefe explained in Slate why that was also Democratic capitulation.

On War Funding: It’s true that the President agreed to the passage of the G.I. bill, which he opposed all along, and extended unemployment benefits to secure $162 in funding for the war operations, but in this case, he had no choice. He faced a veto-proof majority in Congress. Republicans, already worried about their prosepects in November, sided with Democrats on economics and support for the soldiers, both of which are big issues. When you don’t have a choice, it’s not much of a compromise.

On the G8 meeting: Yes, the President committed to halving US carbon emmissions by 2050, but he didn’t say how he would do it, and anyway the treaty won’t be negotiated until the end of 2009, so this is an easy decision for him. He can sign it knowing that he doesn’t have to do anything between now and the end of his term to set the country on this goal, or even get the country to agree on this goal. He has to do nothing, and he gets to take credit for trying to be green. Where’s the compromise in that?

The President has not compromised at all.

TAGS: Congress, FISA, NSA, obama, political, Republicans, war

RELATED POSTS:

Charlie Crist’s Slick Move


Thursday, June 19, 2008 - 12:23 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Charlie Crist, the Republican Governor of Florida, has frequently been mentioned as potential VP pick for John McCain. He clearly wants the job, because today he flip-flopped and gave the environment a big F*ck You by supporting McCain’s plan to drill off the coast for oil and gas. In 2006, Crist opposed Congressional plans, which Bush supported, to expand oil and gas drilling in the coastal areas. After hearing that McCain wants to drill (I’ll save McCain’s energy flip-flops and his apparent lack of knowledge about his own environmental plan for another post), though , Crist pivoted and decided that it was ok to drill after all. The plan probably isn’t going anywhere, despite GOP hopes that $4 per gallon gasoline will create public pressure on Democrats to cave in, or at the very least force them on the defensive on energy policy, but at least now we know what kind of a principled leader Charlie Crist will be if he becomes VP.

Update: I forgot to mention that after Crist decided to back McCain’s plan, Bush also came out in favor of drilling today. Just what McCain needed, a spotlight on the fact that he and Bush are once again in agreement on policy.

   

TAGS: Boston, Congress, GOP, John McCain, mccain

RELATED POSTS:

Porno Judge


Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 10:41 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Ok, you’re the chief judge of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California and one of the highest-ranking judges in the land. People say you have a brilliant legal mind, and some people think that you’ll one day be sitting on the Supreme Court. So, what do you do in your spare time?

(a) Pore over legal briefs

(b) Give lectures at bar associations or at university law schools

(c) Post sexually explicit material on your website, including pictures of women on all fours painted like cows, a half-naked man “cavorting” with a farm animal, masturbation, and scenes of public sex.

Judge Alex Kozinski chose (c). When the LA Times inquired about the pictures, he responded that some of them were “funny”, and he said that he’d placed them on the website, because he thought that the public couldn’t access it. Then, the next day, Judge Kozinski told the Times that his son, Yale, called and said that he’d uploaded most of the photos, and that sounded right “because I sure don’t remember putting some of that stuff there.” All of this happened a couple of days before Kozinski was scheduled to hear arguments in a case against Ira Issacs, who is accused of distributing sexual fetish videos that include beastiality! Did Issacs luck out or what?! Overseeing his trial is a guy who’s into bestiality, or at least into viewing it. Of course, the trial was suspended for 48 hours, and Kozinski has now called for the ethics panel to investigate his conduct.

Now, when I first read this story yesterday, I thought…how could this guy have been dumb enough to post that kind of stuff on a publicly accessible website? Naturally, he was under the impression that it was totally private. The LA Times confirmed his son’s claim that it’s on his private server and the domain name is registered to Yale Kozinski. Basically, his son said that he didn’t configure the site properly and didn’t know that it could be accessed by the public. He said that only family and friends had access to the site. Still, it seems like maybe one of those family members or friends sold him out. According to the LA Times,

“Before the site was blocked, visitors to http://alex.kozinski.com saw a message: “Ain’t nothin’ here. Y’all best be movin’ on, compadre.” Only those who knew to type in the name of a subdirectory could see the content on the site, which also included some of Kozinski’s essays and legal writings as well as music files and personal photos.”

How else would a reporter get the name of the subfolder unless someone who knew it sold Kozinski out? Scott Glover, the LA Times journalist, hasn’t said (to the best of my knowledge).

Naturally, people are all upset. To me, the only issue here is that he should recuse himself from this case. That much seems pretty obvious. Should he get in trouble for viewing bestiality? Hell no. The guy can do whatever he wants in his spare time, assuming it is legal, since he’s a judge and all. This is all pretty embarrassing for the Kozinskis, and unfortunately for him, this is going to kill any chance of him ever getting to the Supreme Court. Still, as the LA Times noted, only Congress can fire federal judges, although maybe his fellow judges will censure him (seems unlikely given that it’s California).

 Mooooo!

TAGS: Congress, Music, Schools, Supreme Court, Video

RELATED POSTS:

Iraqi Lawmakers Push Back Against US Demands


Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 12:22 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Iraqi lawmakers are pissed at the US administration and decided to go public with the news that the US wants 58 “long-term” bases in Iraq, among other things, as part of a “status of forces” agreement between the US and Iraq. The Iraqis see the US demands as stripping their government of a significant amount of sovereignty. According to the Washington Post article, lawmakers close to Maliki revealed that the US had originally wanted 200 facilities in Iraq and now want the 58 bases. In addition to that, they also want to retain the authority to detain and hold Iraqis without turning them over to Iraq, immunity for US troops and private contractors, and the ability to conduct operations without approval from the Iraqi government. So let’s see, we get to camp out in Iraq for a long time, we get to hold and detain anyone we think is a combatant and presumably get to subject that person to a US military commission, and US troops and contractors follow US laws. Isn’t this called a state within a state?

Some people are going to say that Maliki may have been influenced by the Ayatollah Khamenei, who told Maliki during his visit to Iran that Iraq’s biggest problem was the US presence and that he shouldn’t sign any agreement. Others will suggest that the Iraqis are upset that the US is holding $50 billion in Iraqi funds hostage to pressure Iraq to sign the agreement. Those are both possible, but I think what has got Maliki and his friends so worried is looking like a bunch of pansies and puppets to the Iraqi people. What they want, what they need, is US protection. However, they don’t want to be seen as a puppet government, and that’s exactly what will happen if they sign an agreement that demands so much from them (ok, most Iraqis likely already see them as puppets). Make no mistake: Maliki is covering his ass here. Several Iraqi lawmakers in the Washington Post story suggested that if the US doesn’t back down, then they won’t sign it and will either try to get changes made to the U.N., or maybe they’ll just ask the US to leave! However, this quote by Jalal al-Din al-Saghir, a senior lawmaker in the Supreme Council party, the largest Shiite party in Iraq, tells you clearly what they’re really after:

“Maybe the Iraqi government will say: ‘Hey, the security situation is better. We don’t need any more troops in Iraq,’ ” he said. “Or we could have a pledge of honor where the American troops leave but come back and protect Iraq if there is any aggression.”

That would probably be agression from al-Qaeda, Sadr, or Iran. They want US protection but they want to make it look like this agreement was done on their terms and they didn’t give up a whole lot. They’re also upset because they thought that this was already part of the deal.

U.S. negotiators also said the agreements would not obligate the American military to protect Iraq from foreign aggression, Iraqi officials said, a promise they believe was a fundamental part of a declaration of principles signed by Bush and Maliki last winter.

So, the Iraqis are threatening to kick the US out unless the US backs off several of its key demands and agrees to protect Iraq. And if the US agrees, then it gets to have long term bases AND has to protect Iraq. But don’t worry folks, this isn’t an Iraq forever policy. Right? Well, maybe there’s some upside to all of this…at least the Iraqi government is uniting on something. Oh wait, Grand Ayatollah Sistani opposes the agreement in its current form (though he did lay out 4 conditions that any agreement should follow, but they’d be very tough for the US to meet), as does Sadr.

If you don’t know about the status of forces agreement, the Bush administration claims it is “nonbinding” and doesn’t require the approval of Congress because it’s not actually a treaty. It’s true that we have 80 such agreements in countries where US troops are stationed, as the Washington Post points out, but the US is essentially committing its troops to the battle in Iraq for an unspecified amount of time and saying that the President can order this without regard for Congress. The administration is pushing this agreement because the UN mandate for having troops in Iraq expires at the end of this year, and an agreement between Iraq and the US would give the administration a legal basis for keeping US troops in Iraq.

Maliki meeting with Iran\'s Khamenei

TAGS: Al-Qaeda, Congress, Iran, Iraq, Shiite

RELATED POSTS:

AP (yes, AGAIN): Hillary Open to VP


Tuesday, June 3, 2008 - 5:09 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

The Associated f–king Press is running the world today:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton has told congressional colleagues she would be open to becoming Barack Obama’s vice presidential nominee, saying she would consider it if it would help Democrats win the White House.

Clinton, a New York senator, made the comment on a conference call with other New York lawmakers Tuesday, according a participant on the call.

The senator’s remarks came in response to a question from Democratic Rep. Nydia Velazquez who said she believed the best way for Obama to win over key voting blocs, including Hispanics, would be for him to choose Clinton as his running mate.

“I am open to it,” Clinton replied, if it would help the party’s prospects in November.

I’ve been through the arguments pro and con on Hillary as VP. Yes, she is a bigfoot. As is Bill. And she’s polarizing. Of course, conventional wisdom says VP’s don’t effect elections. Then there’s some who say the VP doesn’t matter at all. But I am for Obama-Clinton for three reasons. The majority of Dems support a joint ticket (55% at least). A black man has never run for Prez before and conventional wisdom need not apply in 08, so having the top brand in GOP-hate politics on the ticket is a positive. And VP’s do matter (see Cheney, Dick), and no one is more qualified than an ex-co-president. Let’s see how it plays…MSNBC (Matthews, Todd, and Micthell) is all over this one right now too BTW…

TAGS: Barack Obama, Congress, election, GOP, Hillary, joint ticket, NATO, New York, obama, Politics

RELATED POSTS:

Future “USA” (A is for Awesome)


Thursday, May 15, 2008 - 9:51 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

I don’t know about you, but I’m dying to time travel to 2013, when John McCain says that some of America’s biggest problems will magically have been solved, including Iraq (mostly anyway)! Education will be better, taxes will be fairer, Iran will no longer be pursuing nuclear weapons and North Korea will be getting rid of its, the “League of Democracies” will have managed to convince the government of Sudan to accept a multi-national peacekeeping force that puts a stop the genocide in Darfur (no word yet on whether the negotiations were held at the Hall of Justice), and America will no longer be dependent on foreign oil! Seriously, how sweet is future America? Here’s how sweet:

: We beat al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda in Iraq, and we killed or captured Osama bin Laden! We rock. I knew we’d get that son of a bitch sooner or later. We also managed to teach the Pakistanis those insurgency tactics that helped us pacify Iraq and Afghanistan, so now the militants in the tribal areas are on the run. Seriously, who saw this coming? I know I didn’t. I mean, John McCain gave a speech in July 2007 where he was talking about all the things he’d do as President, and he said that “These are not measures that will pay quick dividends. We must understand that we confront a lengthy struggle - a long war - that will not be won quickly or easily. But we will win it.” And win it he did, in just five years! He must have been joking later in that same speech when he said that “While our ultimate victory is not in doubt, the length and intensity of this struggle remain to be determined.” And I’m sure he didn’t mean that “We are in a long twilight struggle with radical Islamic extremism.”  Very sly John McCain…why didn’t you tell me it’d only take five years to accomplish all this, you kidder?

: Our economy, which was on the brink of recession in mid-2008, has just “experienced several years of robust economic growth.” We also cut the capital gains tax, corporate taxes, fixed the AMT, and enlarged tax breaks. How’d we afford this? Well, we managed to save money because Congress was way too afraid of John McCain’s veto power and stopped sending him any bills with earmarks in them, plus we saved a bunch of money when John McCain fixed social security and cut programs that “serve no important purpose” (like social security and medicare). Oh yeah, there’s also a flat tax. About time. Everyone knows that the rich pay way too much.

: The food crisis is over and prices for commodities and goods have leveled off! Thanks, John McCain.

: Not only did John McCain make our country better, he also helped to improve the lives of people in some of the most impoverished countries in the world. Has there ever been a better President?

: Test scores and graduation rates are rising, while obesity is down! John McCain made us smarter and slimmer. Oh yeah, everyone some people have health care!

You like? There’s lots more where that came from in his speech. If you want the 30-second version, check out the YouTube Preview Image.

John McCain: the number one pick in fantasy leagues around the country this year.

mccain_laugh.jpg

TAGS: Al-Qaeda, Congress, economy, Iran, Iraq, Islam, John McCain, mccain, Osama bin Laden, Politics, Slam, Travel, war, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

Is that a flag lapel pin I see?


Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 10:43 am (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

81074783.jpgmississippi.gif
Left, for the last two days, Senator Obama has worn a flag lapel pin, proving he doesn’t hate America. Right, with Mississippi so goes the nation?

Political Round-up
Oh yeah, there was primary last night too. Hillary Clinton won