Skip to Content Skip to Search Go to Top Navigation Go to Side Menu


Au Revoir and RNC


Tuesday, September 9, 2008 - 3:09 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Hey all. This is my last post here at Medicine. I had a great time writing about dumb shit for the past 8 or so months. Thanks to John for giving me such a great experience in cyberspace.

I started a new site with Inigo, Jeff N, and a few others called Shiite Happens. (Below is the first post.) For now, it will be a political, arts, and culture blog with a young-ish voice, much like Medicine, but with more original video content. We’ll have a redesign and hopefully our own url soon. Please ignore the generic design for now. There won’t be any ads or commercial aspect and it will operate as a cooperative. We’re looking for writers, so give me a shout at wormetheperm {at} hotmail(.)com if you’d like to contribute.

Anyway, I’ve been out in Denver and Minneapolis for the Conventions with Inigo Gilmore, a filmmaker friend. And tomorrow we’re going moose hunting in Alaska. Despite our being robbed twice over the past two weeks, a video diary of the RNC was still able to be cut for Britain’s Channel 4. Note the shot of Inigo getting shot at by police (with rubber bullets of course) during a riot in St Paul.

 

Sarah Palin and the Re-Rise of the Republicans: An RNC Diary

1
I’m in Minneapolis, having arrived from Denver on Sunday night. With me: Inigo Gilmore, a British journalist and filmmaker who recently relocated to New York after a year’s stint in Bangkok for Channel 4 UK. That morning, we’d awoken to find our rented SUV had been broken in to, and someone had stolen the tapes from Obama’s stadium coronation. The video and still cameras were safe, but everything else—chargers, bags, tripod, batteries—gone.

So our arrival at the Republican Convention came without glory. Luckily we were staying at a nice loft in downtown St. Paul, just blocks from the Xcel Center. To forget about our Denver loss, we trekked across St. Paul’s quaint downtown looking for a bar. It’s 10m. The bars, which normally close at 2am, are supposedly open until 4am all week, but few people are out.

“The thing about St Paul is that it’s only a few hundred thousand people,” says the local who’s guiding us. “It may be the smallest city to ever hold a national Convention.”

We stop at a dive-y bar on 7th Ave, St Paul’s pedestrian mall. Neon beer signs dangle on the windows. Dart boards and pool tables are visible inside. Sitting outside, we realize 20 or so Texas delegates surround us. Clustered around two pitcher strewn tables, the Texans meet every cliche: loud, foul mouthed, cross bearing, light beer loving, and cigar chomping. They wear orthopedic shoes, unrevealing dresses, snakeskin, denim…

Our next stop was another bar filled with boozing Texas delegates. Third stop: booze, Texans. Later, we even stumble on a hotel with a sign reading, “WELCOME TEXAS DELEGATION! Crowne Plaza Hotel…”

Aside from cowboy hats and generic clothing, what else did these Texans have in common? A shockingly passionate love for Ron Paul and his post-libetarianism. Few of the Texans we meet even like John McCain.

“We support McCain because we are Republicans,” one says. “But Ron Paul is beyond partisian politics.” Then comes a detailed Paul “Revolution”-ary spiel, which I block out. Yet as Convention eve came to a close, the Paul insurgency made clear that this year’s GOP was indeed a fractured party.

2
Monday. The Twin Cities got hit by twin bombshells. First, due to Hurricane Gustav, day one of the Convention was canceled, meaning no President Bush. Second, Sarah Palin, the dark horse Alaskan Governor McCain chose for VP, has a 17-year-old pregnant daughter. Some Convention so far, eh GOP? No opening night and so much for the whole family values and no sex before marriage thing.

Around noon we hear about a anti-war protest. Venturing from the loft, on 4th Street, up a block or two, we quickly realize this is no mere protest. On a street corner stood fifty plus cops in full riot gear—helmets, bulging pads, gas masks, sticks and tazers at the ready. The police surround about twenty black-clad, masked anarchists. The anarchos are backed against a building and all have their hands up, but they yell to the few onlookers and journalists on hand.

“We did nothing!” one kid in googles yells.

“These are our streets!” they chant.

A few blocks away we spot a beat-up blue Volvo blocking a major intersection connecting St Paul to the highway that leads to Minneapolis. About two dozen cops cordon the area. Inside the car I see a black clad youth chained to the steering wheel. A big yellow forklift arrives. I hear a buzzsaw. The cops are cutting the anarchist out of the car. Once he’s been removed and arrested, the forklift removes the car and dumps it on a grass lot.

Pushing further downtown we cross paths with about two hundred “direct action” folks. They even have a trance/techno soundtrack (c/o a red wagon with a stereo and “Funk the War” signs). But the mostly black wearing bandana crew seem confused as to where they’re headed.

“C’mon, this way,” yells one.

“No, this way,” shouts another, who eventually wins out.

But the confusion ends when it comes to the marchers’ intent. These folks want nothing short of destruction of the capatilist state. I’ve witnessed a few dozen riots in my day—mostly sports related—but I’ve never seen such a long, uncontested orgy of smashed windows, popped tires, trash can flipping, road blocking, and wreckage. Inigo captures a long shot of people running up the road by a big Macy’s, where a black woman sits on a bench smiling, Macy bags at her feet. Just then, two anarchists charge from behind with a metal grate. It takes a few tries, but they smash the windows.
(more…)

TAGS: 2000, 2004, Amy Goodman, beer, BOOKS, Bush, Campaign, Congress, contest, Denver, dog, Fox News, free, GOP, Gustav, Hillary, iPod, Iraq, John McCain, kids, mccain, Music, New York, New York Times, NPR, nypd, obama, political, Politics, Pregnant, Race, Rap, Republicans, RNC, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin, Shiite, Soundtrack, spin, Sports, Texas, the Replacements, Trade, Video, war, williamsburg, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

Palin, Day Two


Saturday, August 30, 2008 - 12:30 pm (EST)
By a.p.

Good lord, the hits just keep on coming.

*edit: wow.  I’m looking forward to seeing how this one plays out.

Then there’s this little video spot that was just scrubbed from Palin’s website, featuring a recently quite humbled Ted Stevens (aka: Master of the Tubes) giving her a ringing endorsement during her campaign for Governor.

YouTube Preview Image

And then there’s hilarious shit like this — Palin on the VP spot last month:

“As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day? I’m used to being very productive and working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position…”

Nice.

Read the article here.

This is the sort of stuff that keeps me up at night:

“She wouldn’t have articulated one coherent policy, and people would just be fawning all over her,” said Andrew Halcro, a Republican turned independent, who along with Tony Knowles, a Democrat, ran against Palin for governor in 2006.”

More on that here.

And, hey, McCain really put a lot of time and energy into his careful selection of a running mate and potential replacement (a “heartbeat” away) — afterall, he met Palin ONE TIME before choosing her.

Ultimately, I agree with both Elisberg and Jones over at HuffPo.

I’m off to enjoy my holiday weekend upstate.  See you next week.

TAGS: election, Hillary, mccain, Politics, Vice, Video, war, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

DNC: (Bill) Clinton Delivers, Biden Accepts, Obama Surprises


Thursday, August 28, 2008 - 12:56 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

The talkingheads thought that Hillary wasn’t effusive enough in her praise of Obama last night, but she came through brilliantly for Barack. She had a tough hurdle to overcome, with everyone looking to her to unify the party despite the fact that she’s undoubtedly still upset about how the primary went. She rose to the challenge, telling her diehard supporters to look into the mirror and ask themselves whether they just supported her or the policies and the ideals that she stood for. The message was clear: Obama is her candidate, and if you supported her in the primary, you should get behind Obama.

Tonight, her husband had a similar challenge. Some in Hillary’s camp claimed that there was a rift between Bill Clinton and Obama, but the former president left no doubt that Obama would be getting his vote in November. Although the Clintons themselves questioned Obama’s experience and readiness to lead during the primary, Bill delivered for Obama. Talking about his bid for the White House in 1992, he said:

Republicans said I was too young and too inexperienced to be commander in chief. Sound familiar? It didn’t work in 1992, because we were on the right side of history. And it won’t work in 2008, because Barack Obama is on the right side of history.

Again, more on the readiness issue:

Everything I’ve learned in eight years as president and the work I’ve done since, in America and across the globe, has convinced me that Barack Obama is the man for this job.

The bottom line is that the Clintons came through for Obama, setting aside whatever personal animosity arose during the primary to do their part (some would say it came a little late, and it’s a fair point, but they stepped up at the most important time). 

Joe Biden’s son, Beau, delivered a heart-warming and emotional introduction for his dad, who did a good job with his speech. Joe’s speech wasn’t as good as Hillary’s or Bill’s, but that’s asking a lot. Still, after praising McCain’s heroism, he got down to attacking McCain’s policies. His personal story about growing up as a kid and being taught important life lessons was also well done. Overall, it’s what you’d hope a VP would do.

At the end of Biden’s speech, Obama made a surprise appearance at the Pepsi Center, driving the crowd into a frenzy.

Tomorrow night: The Main Event.

AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

Stephan Savoia/Associated Press; (AFP)

TAGS: attack, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, election, Hillary, Joe Biden, mccain, obama, Republicans, war

RELATED POSTS:

Hillary


Wednesday, August 27, 2008 - 9:07 pm (EST)
By a.p.

demconvention.com

Waiting for the inevitable spectacle of Bill, considering Hillary…

OK, so I’m still a bit bitter that Obama / Clinton couldn’t bury the hatchet enough to get her a ticket invite.  And I’m also peeved at Budget Clinton’s antics in the close down of the primary race — she said some things she shouldn’t have, and she handed the Republicans a couple loaded guns.  Though ultimately, let’s be honest — so did Biden.  It’s politics — the GOP can and will spin it into oblivion…along with everything else.  We should take care to not follow suit.

And, as a further caveat, I could never wholeheartedly back Clinton for the top spot on the ticket, as oligarchies really freak me out (go figure).  But that’s of no consequence here.

What does matter at the moment is that, last night, Clinton proved why she was such a contender in the first place — not for her relations with a former President, but for her own skills as an orator, leader, and politician.  I may not make friends in some circles with a statement like that, but those are pretty pedantic circles anyway.

Admittedly, the speech intermittently threatened to tumble into self-aggrandizement (which the Democrats needed like I need my ex-girlfriend’s status updates), but she managed to steer clear of an egregious error — recognizing her own accomplishments, embracing her millions of supporters, and promptly pushing and connecting that phenomenal energy straight over to Obama based on the issues (while getting in a few effective digs at McCain).  She didn’t address her prior attacks on Obama point-by-point — or that ad of McCain’s that uses her words — but she made it pretty fucking clear that a McCain presidency would be a disaster, and that Obama was the only way to ride… ’nuff said as far as I’m concerned.

Again, this is politics — she doesn’t need to paint him as the second coming, she needs to outline the case for his presidency.  And she did just that.  Let sleeping dogs lie on the personal front.

In the process, she cemented her position as a matriarch of both the Democratic party and the women’s movement in general (if she wasn’t both already), but she did it with a strange grace and style that left me feeling like she was just up there doing us all a favor.

Also, as an aside, Hillary was back in the character that she has historically been known and loved for.  Gone was the scheming and pandering of a desperate candidate on the stump — the overly placating and phony presentation of a woman dancing awkwardly between an air of disbelief at imminent failure and a tenuous hope in some sort of inevitable triumph.  And thank god she got that out of her system.

The best news?  The Democratic party came out of the primary season with not one but two powerhouses.

demconvention.comWatch her slide from a whole load of “I’m awesome, thanks” over to “Barack Obama for President”:

“I ran for president to renew the promise of America. To rebuild the middle class and sustain the American Dream, to provide the opportunity to work hard and have that work rewarded, to save for college, a home and retirement, to afford the gas and groceries and still have a little left over each month.

To promote a clean energy economy that will create millions of green collar jobs.

To create a health care system that is universal, high quality, and affordable so that parents no longer have to choose between care for themselves or their children or be stuck in dead end jobs simply to keep their insurance.

To create a world class education system and make college affordable again.

To fight for an America defined by deep and meaningful equality — from civil rights to labor rights, from women’s rights to gay rights, from ending discrimination to promoting unionization to providing help for the most important job there is: caring for our families. To help every child live up to his or her God-given potential.

To make America once again a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws.

To bring fiscal sanity back to Washington and make our government an instrument of the public good, not of private plunder.

To restore America’s standing in the world, to end the war in Iraq, bring our troops home and honor their service by caring for our veterans.

And to join with our allies to confront our shared challenges, from poverty and genocide to terrorism and global warming.

Most of all, I ran to stand up for all those who have been invisible to their government for eight long years.

Those are the reasons I ran for president. Those are the reasons I support Barack Obama. And those are the reasons you should too.”

Welcome back, Hill.  And thanks.

YouTube Preview Image

TAGS: attack, Barack Obama, dog, economy, global warming, GOP, Hillary, Iraq, mccain, obama, Politics, Race, Republicans, spin, Vice, war, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

What happened to Budget Hillary?


Tuesday, August 26, 2008 - 8:16 pm (EST)
By Tommy Esquire

Part of the brilliant strategy of the last three months of Hillary Clinton’s primary run (too little too late, but give credit where it’s due) was dressing like the voters she wanted.  The earthtoned pantsuits and expensive backdrops of her early “inevitable” campaign didn’t get her anywhere, so she swallowed her taste and went for bright-colored shiny suits that a woman in Anytown Rustbelt USA would wear to a job interview or church (except for the pants).  How can you connect with the Jack-and-Diane types when you’re dressed for a D.C. cocktail party?  But judging from her post-primary appearances, she looks like she’s back to fundraising in White Plains.  Fine-tailored suits, colors that don’t hurt your eyes, even pearls.  Welcome back, Bougie Hillary.

Before:

After:

TAGS: Hillary, Hillary Clinton

RELATED POSTS:

Ranking Obama’s VP Choices


Monday, August 18, 2008 - 12:43 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine


Barry at the bar in Reno, yesterday…EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/Getty Images

So, here we go. One week until the Democratic National Convention in Denver. Obama is expected to announce his running mate this week, and I’m gonna rank my top choices. Since I’m still not sure America will vote for a black dude named Barack over a honky named John, my VP picks are based on national following, potential honky attraction, and voter trust value . 

1. John Kerry
This was floated by WBZ Boston Friday and picked up by Drudge this weekend. I think Kerry supplies everything Obama needs to win undecided voters’ trust. Kerry’s been a Senator for decades. He’s fought the GOP in a Presidential election—and won more votes than any Democrat ever. He served in Vietnam, with honor. He’s a national brand who’s been uber-vetted. Obama-Kerry is a sure win.

2. Hillary Clinton
George Stephanopoulos says she’s a “50-1″ shot. Still, Obama-Clinton is another can’t lose option. No one hates Republicans more than Hillary (they tried to ruin her family, dammit!), and she got 18 million votes in the primary. I disagree that the Clintons’ “baggage” would really affect Obama. Even post-Gore and Cheney, the VP is still a relatively weak office. Clinton as VP would neutralize her.

3. Joe Biden
As much as I love Biden, he is a bit of a loose cannon and may wind up as a liability in the general—kind of like a smart Dan Quayle. But the guy has the Washington and foreign affairs experience Obama lacks. I don’t know if it’s a sure thing, but Obama-Biden is a great ticket.

4. Sam Nunn
Nunn’s a fine peacenik, but after three decades in Washington, he’s hardly a changenik, and if you’re gonna forgo the whole “new politics” thing you mine as well pick an established national candidate like Kerry or Clinton. Nunn might be able to deliver Georgia, but he won’t help much in winning voter trust nationally.

5. Kaine, Bayh, Warner…
Yes, each brings a potential swing state victory, but none are nationally known, meaning the O Team will have to sell two personas instead of just The One. 

Whatever happens, Obama better not pick a Republican.

TAGS: Boston, Denver, election, georgia, GOP, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Nas, NATO, obama, Politics, Republicans, war

RELATED POSTS:

Mark Penn: Question Obama’s “lack of American roots”


Sunday, August 10, 2008 - 11:33 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Politico writes that the Atlantic will be publishing a piece on the dysfunctional internal workings of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and the story will reveal that Penn suggested painting Obama as foreign and un-American.

I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and in his values.

Stay classy, Mark.

TAGS: Hillary, Hillary Clinton, obama, war

RELATED POSTS:

All Politics is Loco


Friday, August 8, 2008 - 1:26 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Those Crazy Dems

1. John Edwards as Patrick Batemen
“Beautiful, world-weary, and not yet 21, Alison Poole is what her new boyfriend calls a postmodern girl,” first sentence of the jacket copy from Jay McInerney’s Story of My Life (Atlantic/Grove 1988).

This John Edwards love child scandal is mind blowing. Dude supposedly screwed Rielle Hunter, a videographper who was the basis for Alison Poole, a fictional character in Jay McInerney’s second novel, Story of My Life. Poole was stolen from McInerney by his friend and fellow novelist Brett Easton Ellis, who killed her in American Psycho, then brought her back to life for Glamorama. The Edwards-Hunter scandal broke c/o (who else) The National Enquirer.Of course, Page Six is destroying this story like it’s 9/11. Meanwhile, Romenesko, a blog about the death of newspapers, is covering the story’s noncoverage by national newspapers. All this makes for the most postmodern political scandal ever.

Edwards always claimed to be a populist crusader. But his 6000-sq ft, $6 million house is the most expensive in his North Carolina county. His wife has terminal cancer and he’s still fucking a former NY party girl. I thus suspect John Edwards has a small penis. How else can you explain it?

2. Hillary and Obama Need to Cut the Shit, Announce Joint Ticket, Win White House
The Veepstakes are moving along with all the excitement of mold growth. None of the prospective picks (Kaine, Warner, Webb, Bahy etc) have the national following that could help Obama win voters’ trust (polls call him 24% “riskier” than McCain). In about two weeks, it’s all gonna come down to polling—what do women want; who polls best with the working class—but right now the Clintons are again stealing headlines. The NY Observer, like NY Mag before them, says Obama’s best way to win in November is with a Clinton VP:

But there’s another way that may seem more tempting now than it once did: teaming up with Clinton. Yes, her presence would turn off some independent voters, but it would also fully unify the party and – far more importantly – it would offer powerful emotional reassurance to the wavering voters who want to support Obama but who are liable to succumb to attacks on his experience. For millions of casual voters, Clinton has come to represent the very toughness and seasoning that Obama is said to lack. They want to vote Democratic this fall, but if they believe Obama is too risky, they will default to McCain, the “safe” choice. By picking Clinton, Obama would be telling these voters, in effect, that he’ll be operating with adult supervision.”

TAGS: attack, Hillary, Jay, joint ticket, mccain, obama, political, Politics, polls, Video, war

RELATED POSTS:

The $52 Million Dollar Man


Thursday, July 17, 2008 - 12:35 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

The Barry Files

Pic by Karen Bleir, Obama halo…

Obama raised $52 million in June, mostly from big donors, for the second highest total of his campaign. The total is unexpectedly high, given that May was his slowest month yet, with only $21 million raised. Quite simply, John McCain cannot keep up. He raised a mere $22 million in June. But don’t let the $ fool you. Hillary was out raised 2-1 but still wound up getting 500,000 more votes than Obama from March onward.

A story in the Times today about Iraqi opinion of Obama and his withdrawal plan has the week’s money quote:

“In no way do I favor the occupation of my country,” said Abu Ibrahim, a Western-educated businessman in Baghdad, “but there is a moral obligation on the Americans at this point.”

We’ve ignored the moral questions of withdrawal and the Iraqis who’d be affected for too long. Obama must inject a just war rationale, as defined by your Michael Walzer-types, which states a minimal ethical benchmark for foreign armies conducting regime change and occupation  as providing a functioning state that can secure itself.

Ryan Lizza’s long “Obama in Chicago” story in the terror-jab issue of the New Yorker lacks the depth and first person accounts of David Mendell’s book “Obama: Promis to Power.” Still, Lizza’s offers new insight on how Obama’s 2002 Iraq speech came to be. Mendell stated that Obama, with an eye on a Senate run, used the speech to win over Axelrod and the Chicago liberal establishment. Lizza says that claim is “dubious.” The piece ends strongly, however:

Perhaps the greatest misconception about Barack Obama is that he is some sort of anti-establishment revolutionary. Rather, every stage of his political career has been marked by an eagerness to accommodate himself to existing institutions rather than tear them down or replace them. When he was a community organizer, he channelled his work through Chicago’s churches, because they were the main bases of power on the South Side. He was an agnostic when he started, and the work led him to become a practicing Christian. At Harvard, he won the presidency of the Law Review by appealing to the conservatives on the selection panel. In Springfield, rather than challenge the Old Guard Democratic leaders, Obama built a mutually beneficial relationship with them.Like many politicians, Obama is paradoxical. He is by nature an incrementalist, yet he has laid out an ambitious first-term agenda (energy independence, universal health care, withdrawal from Iraq). He campaigns on reforming a broken political process, yet he has always played politics by the rules as they exist, not as he would like them to exist. He runs as an outsider, but he has succeeded by mastering the inside game. He is ideologically a man of the left, but at times he has been genuinely deferential to core philosophical insights of the right.

Finally, Obama hit the gym three times yesterday, for a total of 188-minutes of activity, showing up W’s hour per diem of mountain biking and Conde’s bench press/treadmill-ing.

While Obama spent 91 minutes at a campaign event yesterday, the Illinois Senator spent a total of 188 minutes in the gym yesterday –making three separate stops to Chicago gyms over the course of one day.

TAGS: Barack Obama, election, Hillary, Iraq, John McCain, mccain, NATO, New York, obama, political, Politics, Review, war

RELATED POSTS:

The Myth of Barry the Lefty


Thursday, July 10, 2008 - 10:50 am (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

All this shock and awe at Obama’s centrist drift ignores history. Barack Obama was never an uber-liberal, despite his (thin) Senate voting record saying he was the chamber’s resident lefty.

No one better chronicles Obama’s rise to national power than the Chicago Tribune’s David Mendell in his book Obama: From Promise to Power. For the book, Mendell followed Obama from 2003 until he announced his presidential run in early 2007. The politician Mendell describes is a pragmatist with a liberal’s heart; an egotistical, insanely ambitious, and mercurial man who wants to be loved—even if that means appealing to the center for votes; a man whose career has been guided by Washington-insider David Axelrod, with an above-all focus on personal narrative; a natural wonk who has traded policy for vague rhetoric to achieve political goals; and someone whose political fortunes were dependant on Penny Priztker and Chicago’s Gold Coast monied elite. After reading the book, there’s no question Obama has what it takes to be president. But he’s a politician not a progressive activist.

Those ever-( dare I say over-) influential “Netroots” folks on the left did not study the facts before crowning Obama liberalism’s savior. Obama ran a primary campaign that was to the right of Hillary Clinton on domestic issues. (Remember, triangulated centrism was a mid-90s Clinton specialty.) Still, the net-left gave Barry unending support.

Now Obama’s disregarded the constitution in favor of telecoms—you know, phone companies, the little guy. He supported a Supreme Court ruling overturning a handgun ban in a city with an unprecedented history of handgun murder. He told black people not to try and be “the next Lil Wayne” (even though Wayne’s studied political science at U Houston and his latest record ends with a six-minute spoken-word political essay), prompting longtime Obama supporter Jesse Jackson to say he wants to “cut his nuts out.” He wants to “refine” his unrealistic 16-month Iraq withdrawal promise. And so on.

None of this should come as a surprise, however. Nor does it make Obama a weaker candidate. It just makes him less of the hope/change martyr the net-left worshipped. Of course, it’s hard not to be offended by Obama’s recent moves. But politically I respect his, well, Clintonian dedication to electoral victory at any cost.

After eight years of GOP illegal wars and criminal rule, we need a winner not a savior. And on foreign policy Obama remains a committed multilateralist. I’m looking forward to seeing how Europe and the Middle East greet him on his upcoming tour. Although this TNR piece is pessimistic about the latter stop, saying recent statements at AIPAC on Israel have soured Arab opinion, I’m not sure I buy the authors’ argument. Arabs are foremost a hospitable people. When Obama arrives as a guest, I hope and assume they’ll respond with the same open mindedness that I received upon visiting the region. If Obama needs to drift to the center to win an election so he can carry out a liberal foreign policy, that works for me.

TAGS: Barack Obama, BOOKS, election, GOP, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, Jesse Jackson, Lil Wayne, NPR, NSA, obama, political, Politics, Supreme Court, Trade, war

RELATED POSTS:

Schizo Polls Show Women Warming to Obama, Or Not


Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 10:07 am (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Gallup’s daily tracking faces off against NBC/WSJ, each show different results…

Depending on which poll you look at, Barack Obama is doing much better among female voters - or he still has a big challenge.

Gallup’s daily tracking poll suggests that Obama has widened his lead over John McCain since Hillary Clinton, who bested Obama in the primaries among women, dropped out of the race and endorsed him on Saturday. In tracking polls from May 27 through June 2, Obama led McCain 48 percent to 43 percent among women.

But in tracking polls from last Thursday through Monday, he led the presumptive Republican nominee 51 to 38 percent among women. And among women 50 and older, Obama had turned a 46 to 43 percent deficit into a 47 to 41 percent lead.

But in an NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey released yesterday, while Clinton led McCain by 14 percentage points among suburban women, Obama trailed by 6 percentage points. Overall, Obama led 47 percent to 41 percent.

To win in November, a Democratic presidential candidate typically needs to build a sizable gender gap.

Nationally, over 40% of women are registered Dems, about 25% GOP, and another 25% independents. The Democratic Party as a whole skews about 55% female. Obama must court those female independents…

TAGS: Barack Obama, Boston, GOP, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, John McCain, mccain, obama, polls, Race, war

RELATED POSTS:

Jim Webb VP? No Thanks


Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 11:46 am (EST)
By Ray LeMoine


Ronnie and Jim Webb…


Centrist Anger vs Liberal Hope
All this buzz about Jim Webb being Obama’s running mate is annoying me. I get it: He offers military experience and is a fellow New New Democrat. But the guy is a centrist, former-Republican; a freshman Senator with a staff stocked with amateurs. Webb’snot the man Obama wants as his Cheney, his Gore.

I trudged through Elizabeth Drew’s admiring Webb profile in the NYRB. Drew says Jim Webb can write, ”Fields of Fire  [Webb's 1978 Vietnam novel] has often been called the best book about Vietnam and likened to the war writing of Norman Mailer and Stephen Crane.” In an interview, Drew found Webb friendly despite his prickly reputation. And one must respect Webb’s focus on reforming the GI Bill and veteran care, and his pushing for a GI Bill of Rights. 

Yet by the end of Drew’s piece I didn’t feel like the guy has the same vision for America as a liberal like myself, or Barack Obama (or Hillary Clinton) for that matter. After all, “Webb defends the Vietnam War as strategically necessary,” says Drew. Webb also wrote a famous essay called “Women Can’t Fight” against allowing women to serve in the military—hardly equal opportunity stuff.

Also this week, TNR’s Eva Fairbanks weighs in with a long Webb piece:

Jim Webb’s anger would seem to make him an especially powerful vice-presidential choice for the refined and white-working-class-alienating Barack Obama. But the researchers vetting Obama’s shortlist must be vexed by a question: Is Jim Webb a vessel for the kind of righteous indignation the Democrats need–or is he just too angry to be vice president?

Is “anger” without the liberal views to back it up really what we want? On the war, Webb is great, but on everything else he’s to the right of Obama, Clinton, Edwards, and the Democrtic Party. Webb’s centrist anger contradicts Obama’s hopeful liberal optimism.

TNR writes about Webb’s book about his Scot-Irish ancestry:

Their hero was William Wallace, who “learned early to hate–and to fight–the local English authorities.” In the sixteenth century, writes Webb, the Scots-Irish could be found taking part in “unending blood feuds” in Scotland; by the seventeenth century, they were writing “no surrender” in their own blood during the siege of Londonderry in Ireland; by the eighteenth, they had become “daring moonshine runners” in the colonies; in the nineteenth, they were peopling the “frequently impatient, always outnumbered … wildly and recklessly Celtic” Confederate army against the “plodding” Union force; and, by the twentieth, they were mounting KKK rallies out of “bitterness at being dominated.”

The KKK and Braveheart?

I’ve spent time in Webb’s home base of southwest Virginia. It’s a beautiful place of dense boreal forest, rambling farm fields, and stubby mountains, filled with hard-nosed folk who love work, dogs, fishing, bluegrass (underrated music for sure), and hate commercial development and yuppies. But it’s homogenous, not cosmopolitan like the rest of America. TNR:

Lower-class whites, he believes, have every right to be as angry at Republicans after Bush as they were at Democrats after Johnson. “He was right,” Webb tells me of Barack Obama’s infamous comment that rural whites are “bitter.” “They’re mad.”

The good thing about Hillary was that she got the white-working class vote without betraying her New York, east coast liberal base. Meanwhile, a “mad, bitter” ex-Republican like Webb does not translate to working-class votes:

They [Obama and Webb] appeal to the same voters, wine-track Democrats who come out in unprecedented droves to vote for a black man or a hillbilly white because they want their party to be bigger than themselves. While you’d expect Webb to attract poor, rural beer-trackers, in his 2006 Senate race he didn’t do any better than the previous Democratic candidate had among Appalachian voters in southwestern Virginia; instead, he was propelled to victory by Northern Virginia suburbanites–Obama’s base.

Webb is hardly the “fellow outsider,” as TNR calls him, Obama—or America—needs. He’s not populist enough to get blue collar votes and he has written negatively about women. Or, Webb offers no help with the voters Obama has yet to fully convert. Obama should chooses a populist, someone with a little more national experience than one Senate term.

TAGS: Barack Obama, beer, BOOKS, dog, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, Music, NATO, New York, NPR, obama, Politics, Race, Republicans, war

RELATED POSTS:

Must Read: John Harris on the End of the Clintons


Monday, June 9, 2008 - 4:46 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine


John Harris has been covering the Clintons for 14 years, first at the Washington Post and now at his successful web start-up Politico. Harris’ book The Survivor is maybe the best single volume on Bill’s presidency. Today, Harris looks back on the rise and fall of the Clintons’ presidential fortunes.

For Clintons, an old dream finally fades
By: John F. Harris
June 9, 2008 07:10 AM EST

This is not the end of the Clinton story. If we know anything about Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton it is that there is always another chapter, and it will not fail to be interesting.

But her departure from the presidential race Saturday almost certainly does mark the end of the longest and most important thread of the Clinton story.

For nearly 40 years, the presidency has been the organizing principle of their lives together. Her appearance at the National Building Museum to thank supporters and endorse Barack Obama represents the final, fading light of a shared dream.

(more…)

TAGS: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, drama, election, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, impeachment, John McCain, mccain, NSA, obama, political, Politics, presidential race, Race, Slam, war

RELATED POSTS:

New Polls Say Dems Want Joint Ticket, 1-5 Hill Voters Go McCain


Monday, June 9, 2008 - 12:31 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Slate…

Even if there’s little evidence for rumors that Hillary Clinton is positioning herself to be Barack Obama’s running mate, this week’s newest poll suggests voters have somewhat latched on to the idea.

According to a May 30-June 3 CBS News poll (PDF), 59 percent of Democratic primary voters want Clinton as Obama’s running mate. That sentiment was similarly echoed in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll conducted on Thursday, in which 54 percent of registered Democrats also supported the so-called “dream ticket.”

Presumably, those numbers possess increased significance in an election fraught with discussion about defection rates. According to the CBS poll, 22 percent of Clinton supporters say they prefer John McCain to Barack Obama. Additionally, 7 percent claim they’re undecided, and 8 percent say they won’t vote at all.

CBS reports that 12 percent of all Democrats currently support McCain, an increase from the 8 percent that deserted John Kerry for George Bush in 2004. Just more than half of Democratic voters—54 percent—reported feeling that the prolonged primary fight has hurt the party’s chances in November, regardless of whom Obama actually taps as his running mate.

I’m not going to piss anymore people off with stating why I’m pro-joint ticket (mainly because it’s a guranteed  win in November, but also because it’s the will of the people, Hilllary’s experience is a net plus for Obama and a way to help him to avoid Bill’s Clinton’s first term missteps, the VP would neutralize Hill from becoming a Senate foe to O’s prez legislature etc). If these numbers don’t change in the coming months, Obama may have little choice but to ask Hillary to jump on board. 22% of Hillary’s 18 million voters is about 4 million people. Bush beat Kerry by about 3 million votes in 2004. Or, Obama needs those votes.

Obamaniacs warmed to Hillary this weekend. (Is saying “I like O” and women rule really all it took?) Let’s watch the polls to see if Obama can convert Hill’s women and white trash–I mean blue collar–honks on his 17-stop working class tour this week.

TAGS: Barack Obama, election, George Bush, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, joint ticket, mccain, obama, polls, war

RELATED POSTS:

Hillary’s Concession Speech


Sunday, June 8, 2008 - 3:37 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

I’ve seen plenty of speeches by McCain, Obama, and Hillary during this election cycle, but Hillary’s concession speech on Saturday may have been the most Presidential speech I’ve seen so far…she was fantastic and struck just the right tone in acknowledging her supporters for all they’d done and encouraging them to work just as hard for Obama in the coming months.

After some serious errors on the campaign trail that made many, myself included, question her loyalty and ethics, it was great to see Senator Clinton give such an incredible speech. I continue to think that she wouldn’t be a great VP choice for a number of reasons, but my opposition to an Obama-Clinton ticket just got a little weaker.

TAGS: election, Hillary, mccain, NATO, obama

RELATED POSTS:

NYT: Clinton Not Seeking VP Nod


Thursday, June 5, 2008 - 3:24 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

The trial balloon pops! Adam Nagourney reports:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton today disavowed a campaign by some of her supporters to pressure Senator Barack Obama into choosing her as a running-mate…

“While Senator Clinton has made clear throughout this process that she will do whatever she can to elect a Democrat to the White House, she is not seeking the vice presidency, and no one speaks for her but her,” Howard Wolfson, one of the campaign’s chief strategists, said in a statement provided to The New York Times. “The choice here is Senator Obama’s and his alone.”

TAGS: Barack Obama, Hillary, NATO, New York, New York Times, obama, war

RELATED POSTS:

Finally. Hillary concedes


Thursday, June 5, 2008 - 2:27 am (EST)
By John LaCroix

In an exclusive email to me only, Hillary finally concedes. (Just kidding, it was probably sent to supporters. Yes, I think I was an early Hillary donor.) So here’s our tip of the hat. Thanks for the laughs Hillary.

Dear John,

I wanted you to be one of the first to know: on Saturday, I will hold an event in Washington D.C. to thank everyone who has supported my campaign. Over the course of the last 16 months, I have been privileged and touched to witness the incredible dedication and sacrifice of so many people working for our campaign. Every minute you put into helping us win, every dollar you gave to keep up the fight meant more to me than I can ever possibly tell you.

On Saturday, I will extend my congratulations to Senator Obama and my support for his candidacy. This has been a long and hard-fought campaign, but as I have always said, my differences with Senator Obama are small compared to the differences we have with Senator McCain and the Republicans.

I have said throughout the campaign that I would strongly support Senator Obama if he were the Democratic Party’s nominee, and I intend to deliver on that promise.

When I decided to run for president, I knew exactly why I was getting into this race: to work hard every day for the millions of Americans who need a voice in the White House.

I made you — and everyone who supported me — a promise: to stand up for our shared values and to never back down. I’m going to keep that promise today, tomorrow, and for the rest of my life.

I will be speaking on Saturday about how together we can rally the party behind Senator Obama. The stakes are too high and the task before us too important to do otherwise.

I know as I continue my lifelong work for a stronger America and a better world, I will turn to you for the support, the strength, and the commitment that you have shown me in the past 16 months. And I will always keep faith with the issues and causes that are important to you.

In the past few days, you have shown that support once again with hundreds of thousands of messages to the campaign, and again, I am touched by your thoughtfulness and kindness.

I can never possibly express my gratitude, so let me say simply, thank you.

Sincerely,

Hillary Rodham Clinton

TAGS: Hillary, mccain, NATO, obama, Politics, Race, Republicans

RELATED POSTS:

WaPost: Hillary Open to VP


Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 3:52 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Balz:

Hillary Clinton is “absolutely ready” to discuss the vice presidency with Barack Obama and has authorized supporters to encourage Obama to pick her if he feels that will help unify the party and help Democrats win the White House, according to Robert Johnson, the founder of Black Entertainment Television and a prominent Clinton supporter.

Is it just a pose to buy time?

TAGS: Barack Obama, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, obama

RELATED POSTS:

Hillary Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop


Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 2:18 pm (EST)
By Azriel Relph

iPhone magicCan you spot two Med Agency writers?

Last night I attended (snuck into) Hillary’s speech at Baruch College (go CUNY).  I expected it to be a concession speech, and it sure sounded like one at first, with her congratulating Obama and talking about her long journey across America.  However, when she said she would “make no decisions tonight” I was a little surprised.  The girl next to me who I spilled wine on said, “All we need to do is convert some super delegates and we have it,” and I kinda wondered which campaign was actually high on hope.

Really though, what would Hillary gain from conceding before Denver?  Obama does not have a mandate from voters, so if something actually happened where super delegates moved over to her, the nomination could still be hers.  Slim odds, but she can do math, so I don’t see her conceding without a VP spot secured.

TAGS: Hillary, obama

RELATED POSTS: