Skip to Content Skip to Search Go to Top Navigation Go to Side Menu


Russia Supports Keeping US Troops In Iraq


Wednesday, October 22, 2008 - 10:20 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

With growing doubts about the Iraqis agreeing to a Status of Forces Agreement before the end of this year, the US has only one other option to legally stay in Iraq: Get the UN to extend the mandate that allows US forces to operate in Iraq. The fear that the US had was that if the SOFA couldn’t be hammered out, then they’d have to turn to the UN Security Council, where China or Russia could veto a new mandate. The US has been especially worried about Russia, obviously because of the recent breakdown in relations over issues like Kosovo and Georgia. Well, surprise! Russia’s foreign minister said that Russia would support a new UN mandate.

We’ll support Iraq’s request to the U.N. Security Council if the Iraqi government asks for the mandate of the current international military presence to be extended.

Given the tense relations between the US and Russia, why would Russia agree to support a new UN mandate? My guess is because Russia has benefited politically and militarily from having the US bogged down in Iraq for the last 5 years, and Russia is basically positioning itself to bail out the US from an untenable position. Defense Secretary Gates warned of dire consequences if the Iraqis don’t agree to the SOFA, so Russia would position itself as the white knight coming to America’s rescue, and you can be sure they’d play that up to make the US look weak. It’s not a pretty situation for the US right now, and rather than see Russia take credit for aiding the US, the US is likely to ratchet up the pressure on the Iraqis in the coming weeks.

Photo: Iraqi government/AP

TAGS: Iraq, Iraq War, Maliki, russia, united nations

RELATED POSTS:

Petraeus Says “Talk To Enemies”


Thursday, October 9, 2008 - 12:09 am (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Spencer Ackerman attended a talk by General Petraeus at the Heritage Foundation today, and he reports the following:

Petraeus also came out unambiguously in his talk at Heritage for opening communications with America’s adversaries, a position McCain is attacking Obama for endorsing. Citing his Iraq experience, Petraeus said, “You have to talk to enemies.” He added that it was necessary to have a particular goal for discussion and to perform advance work to understand the motivations of his interlocutors.

McCain has been hammering Obama on his position that he’d talk to the leaders of Iran, Syria, Cuba, and North Korea without “preconditions”. Obama has noted that it’s not like he’d invite Castro over for tea, but fundamentally, he thinks that you have to talk to your enemies. He also noted in the 2nd debate that his approach might not work, but that it’s worth trying because it has the potential for a far better outcome. Although Petraeus never came out and said he supported Obama’s plan, it’s hard to read it differently. I wonder if McCain will start calling Petraeus an appeaser.

TAGS: attack, Cuba, debate, ep, Iran, Iraq, mccain, motivation, obama

RELATED POSTS:

Cindy McCain: Attack Dog


Wednesday, October 8, 2008 - 9:37 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

So, most pundits think that Obama beat McCain in last night’s debate. That clearly didn’t sit well with the McCain campaign, so they unleashed Cindy McCain, who could be the future First Lady. Here’s a gem from her speech today:

I’m proud of my sons, but let me tell you, the day that Senator Obama decided to cast a vote to not fund my son when he was serving sent a cold chill through my body.

I’m curious to know if Cindy felt that same chill when her husband also voted not to fund the troops. From CNN:

The vote Mrs. McCain is referencing came in May of 2007, when Obama was one of 14 senators who voted against a war-spending plan that would have provided emergency funds for American troops overseas. He, like many Democrats, was pushing for an end to the war in Iraq, and the legislation included no provisions for that. Before that vote, Obama did support and vote for a funding proposal that included a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq — a troop funding bill McCain opposed.

This line of attack from the McCain campaign is getting ridiculous, mostly because they’ve been called out on it so many times. The point is a simple one: Obama voted against one funding bill that didn’t have a timeline, and McCain voted against one that had a timeline. Period. Neither guy opposes funding the troops. Their disagreement was over the timeline. Of course, with Obama surging in the polls, don’t expect to hear McCain ditch his dishonest statements on this topic.

McCain loves to talk about how he’s going to take care of veterans and he knows how to do that because of his service. Well, the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America released a report yesterday grading members of Congress, including McCain and Obama, on how they voted on 22 key Veterans issues that the IAVA supported. McCain got a “D,” while Obama and Biden both got a “B.”

TAGS: attack, bill, Boston, Campaign, Congress, debate, dog, ep, Iraq, mccain, NATO, obama, political, Politics, Poll, polls, pundits, timeline, Vice, war

RELATED POSTS:

The Debate


Saturday, September 27, 2008 - 3:20 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

For my money, Obama narrowly won this debate, although McCain was a little sharper than I’d expected and certainly scored some points. McCain is the guy who’s had a brutal two weeks, and it only got worse after his stunt where he said he was “suspending” his campaign and suggested the debate should be postponed, and in the polls, and a draw doesn’t do him any good. It is especially damaging to McCain when you consider that the foreign policy largely took center stage last night, and this is an issue that goes to the heart of McCain’s campaign. He’s painted himself as the foreign policy expert and the experienced hand, and he had to clearly demonstrate that he was superior to Obama in this regard. He did no such thing. Obama went toe-to-toe with McCain on all the foreign policy questions, and he hammered McCain on Iraq very effectively. In my mind, McCain scored some points when he lambasted Obama for agreeing to sit down with the Iranian president, but overall, McCain couldn’t separate himself from Obama on the issues of Russia, Georgia, Afghanistan, or Pakistan. McCain’s fumbling of the Pakistani president’s name (he called him Qadari but it’s Zardari) maybe wasn’t the biggest deal, but he claimed that Musharraf took over in 1999 when Pakistan was a “failed state.” That’s simply false. I thought Obama did a great job explaining why the more important fight was in Afghanistan. Overall, Obama showed the voters who are uncomfortable with his grasp of foreign policy that he knows his stuff and would do what it took to protect America. McCain needed a clear win on his central issue of foreign policy, and he didn’t get it.

Obama let the economic debate center too much around earmarks and spending, but he still outclassed McCain on those topics. Most voters rate the economy as their number one issue, and I think Obama was clear about his tax cuts for the middle class and how he planned to make sure everyone had health care, and he slammed McCain for his tax cut plan for the wealthiest and for his giveaways to the oil companies. The economic portion was a clear win for Obama, in my opinion. Both candidates fumbled the ball a bit on the financial crisis, so that was a wash.

So, what did everyone else think? The snap polls of undecided voters following the debate gave Obama a clear win, but it’s usually best to let things settle for a few days and then look at the polls. A lot of people noticed McCain wouldn’t look Obama in the eye and was dismissive of him, and I don’t think that will sit well with people.

The next debate will be on domestic issues, and the final debate will be on the economy, so we’re now moving on to Obama’s turf, which is not good news for McCain.

Pool Photo By Chip Somodevilla

TAGS: brutal, Campaign, debate, economy, georgia, Iran, Iraq, mccain, obama, Poll, polls, russia, Slam

RELATED POSTS:

Every American Should Consider/Watch This…


Friday, September 26, 2008 - 4:12 pm (EST)
By a.p.

…before we rush to grant this administration hundreds of billions of dollars with no caveats, control, or oversight (…sounds eerily like the Iraq debacle, no?)

Consider this:

“Section 8 of the proposed plan says: ‘Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.’  more

And then watch this.

Yes, it’s the Daily Show…but, as has become the norm, Stewart and Co have completely shown the media up when it comes to both the oh-so-desperately-needed muckraker-style journalism (under the guise of satire, of course) and the highlighting of the manipulations, shortcomings and failings of this administration.

So contact your officials to tell them that you’re not going to be fear-mongered into this sort of thing again…and that you expect the same of them.

And what’s the alternative?  Certainly not “do nothing.”  For instance, here’s an idea: listen to Chuck Schumer.

TAGS: Iraq, Review, Sarah Palin, Video, war

RELATED POSTS:

Palin: War With Russia “Perhaps” Necessary


Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 8:30 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Excerpts from Charlie Gibson’s interview with Sarah Palin were released on ABCNews.com, and in a telling moment, Sarah Palin said that war with Russia would “perhaps” be necessary if Georgia or Ukraine were admitted to NATO and Russia invaded either nation.

GIBSON: Would you favor putting Georgia and Ukraine in NATO?

PALIN: Ukraine, definitely, yes. Yes, and Georgia.

GIBSON: Because Putin has said he would not tolerate NATO incursion into the Caucasus.

PALIN: Well, you know, the Rose Revolution, the Orange Revolution, those actions have showed us that those democratic nations, I believe, deserve to be in NATO.

Putin thinks otherwise. Obviously, he thinks otherwise, but…

GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.

But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.

We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.

GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.

PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.

And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.

It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.

His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.

Palin is advocating, as McCain and the hawks in the administration have for some time, that Ukraine and Georgia should both be admitted to NATO, a position that is at odds with the one held by our NATO allies. Most NATO countries were wary of admitting Georgia specifically because of issues of territorial integrity, i.e. the problems in the breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, and because of Russian influence in those areas. Palin thinks that both countries should be admitted to NATO, and if Russia were to attack, the US would “perhaps” have to go to war with Russia, since NATO takes the view that if one country in the alliance is attacked, then all countries in the alliance must come to its defense. She’s right that the NATO treaty calls for all countries to defend an ally in the alliance if it’s attacked, but the larger problem here is that she’s willing to roll the dice on Georgia and Ukraine despite obvious Russian resistance to the plan, and if Russia attacks, well then, we’ll probably have to go to war. It’s the fact that her attitude, one that mirrors McCain’s, is to shoot first and ask questions later. The situation in that region is already serious, but McCain and Palin think that we should ratchet things up a few notches more and if the end result is war, then so be it. It’s this flippancy with respect to foreign policy that has gotten us bogged down in Iraq, and Palin and McCain seem not to have learned anything in the last 6 years in Iraq.

Here’s another example of Palin’s aggresive defense of Georgia, from earlier in the interview:

GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.

The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?

PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…

GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.

PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there.

Russian undoubtedly was overly aggressive and used a disproportional amount of force when it invaded Georgia and pushed into Georgia proper, destroying its military installations and naval vessels. And, it’s pretty clear that Russia was basically waiting for Georgia to try to retake either region by force so that it had a reason to invade. There’s no way that Russia put together an attack like that in 24-48 hours. It was planned out, Saakashvili obliged, and Russia responded. But, unprovoked? Did she forget that the US had specifically warned Saakashvili not to take any aggressive military actions against either breakaway region because Russia would respond? Russian claims of genocide were clearly overblown, but a Russian military response was hardly out of the question given that Russian troops were stationed in South Ossetia and thousands of people in each region are Russian citizens. In the larger context, Russia was obviously drawing a line in the sand with respect to what it viewed as NATO interference in its backyard, and it moved to protect what it views as its legitimate interests in the region. So, should we keep pushing for Georgia and Ukraine to be admitted to NATO? F. Stephen Larrabee of the CFR thinks that this a time for caution, not further escalating tensions.

The issue here is not simply Georgia. Georgia is a sideshow. What the Russians are really concerned about is Ukraine. Georgia’s entry into NATO wouldn’t have major strategic consequences for Russia. Ukraine on the other hand, is a very different matter. That would have much greater strategic consequences and destroy any possibility of trying to develop a Slavic Union composed of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine. It would also have an effect on the Russian defense industry because they don’t want to break those ties between the defense industries of Russia and Ukraine. So the strategic consequences of Ukraine joining NATO far exceed those of Georgia. In short, this is much more about Ukraine.

The real question for the United States in the aftermath of what happened in Georgia is whether this is the right time to accelerate efforts to bring Ukraine into NATO? I would think this would be a time when we want to be cautious and careful.

Also, what about Palin’s experience with Russia?

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

Super! So, she’s apparently learned all she needs to know about Russia by being that country’s neighbor and because you can apparently see Russian land from Alaska. That’s very comforting.

TAGS: attack, georgia, HBO, Interview, Iraq, John McCain, mccain, NATO, NPR, Politics, putin, russia, Sarah Palin, war

RELATED POSTS:

Au Revoir and RNC


Tuesday, September 9, 2008 - 3:09 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Hey all. This is my last post here at Medicine. I had a great time writing about dumb shit for the past 8 or so months. Thanks to John for giving me such a great experience in cyberspace.

I started a new site with Inigo, Jeff N, and a few others called Shiite Happens. (Below is the first post.) For now, it will be a political, arts, and culture blog with a young-ish voice, much like Medicine, but with more original video content. We’ll have a redesign and hopefully our own url soon. Please ignore the generic design for now. There won’t be any ads or commercial aspect and it will operate as a cooperative. We’re looking for writers, so give me a shout at wormetheperm {at} hotmail(.)com if you’d like to contribute.

Anyway, I’ve been out in Denver and Minneapolis for the Conventions with Inigo Gilmore, a filmmaker friend. And tomorrow we’re going moose hunting in Alaska. Despite our being robbed twice over the past two weeks, a video diary of the RNC was still able to be cut for Britain’s Channel 4. Note the shot of Inigo getting shot at by police (with rubber bullets of course) during a riot in St Paul.

 

Sarah Palin and the Re-Rise of the Republicans: An RNC Diary

1
I’m in Minneapolis, having arrived from Denver on Sunday night. With me: Inigo Gilmore, a British journalist and filmmaker who recently relocated to New York after a year’s stint in Bangkok for Channel 4 UK. That morning, we’d awoken to find our rented SUV had been broken in to, and someone had stolen the tapes from Obama’s stadium coronation. The video and still cameras were safe, but everything else—chargers, bags, tripod, batteries—gone.

So our arrival at the Republican Convention came without glory. Luckily we were staying at a nice loft in downtown St. Paul, just blocks from the Xcel Center. To forget about our Denver loss, we trekked across St. Paul’s quaint downtown looking for a bar. It’s 10m. The bars, which normally close at 2am, are supposedly open until 4am all week, but few people are out.

“The thing about St Paul is that it’s only a few hundred thousand people,” says the local who’s guiding us. “It may be the smallest city to ever hold a national Convention.”

We stop at a dive-y bar on 7th Ave, St Paul’s pedestrian mall. Neon beer signs dangle on the windows. Dart boards and pool tables are visible inside. Sitting outside, we realize 20 or so Texas delegates surround us. Clustered around two pitcher strewn tables, the Texans meet every cliche: loud, foul mouthed, cross bearing, light beer loving, and cigar chomping. They wear orthopedic shoes, unrevealing dresses, snakeskin, denim…

Our next stop was another bar filled with boozing Texas delegates. Third stop: booze, Texans. Later, we even stumble on a hotel with a sign reading, “WELCOME TEXAS DELEGATION! Crowne Plaza Hotel…”

Aside from cowboy hats and generic clothing, what else did these Texans have in common? A shockingly passionate love for Ron Paul and his post-libetarianism. Few of the Texans we meet even like John McCain.

“We support McCain because we are Republicans,” one says. “But Ron Paul is beyond partisian politics.” Then comes a detailed Paul “Revolution”-ary spiel, which I block out. Yet as Convention eve came to a close, the Paul insurgency made clear that this year’s GOP was indeed a fractured party.

2
Monday. The Twin Cities got hit by twin bombshells. First, due to Hurricane Gustav, day one of the Convention was canceled, meaning no President Bush. Second, Sarah Palin, the dark horse Alaskan Governor McCain chose for VP, has a 17-year-old pregnant daughter. Some Convention so far, eh GOP? No opening night and so much for the whole family values and no sex before marriage thing.

Around noon we hear about a anti-war protest. Venturing from the loft, on 4th Street, up a block or two, we quickly realize this is no mere protest. On a street corner stood fifty plus cops in full riot gear—helmets, bulging pads, gas masks, sticks and tazers at the ready. The police surround about twenty black-clad, masked anarchists. The anarchos are backed against a building and all have their hands up, but they yell to the few onlookers and journalists on hand.

“We did nothing!” one kid in googles yells.

“These are our streets!” they chant.

A few blocks away we spot a beat-up blue Volvo blocking a major intersection connecting St Paul to the highway that leads to Minneapolis. About two dozen cops cordon the area. Inside the car I see a black clad youth chained to the steering wheel. A big yellow forklift arrives. I hear a buzzsaw. The cops are cutting the anarchist out of the car. Once he’s been removed and arrested, the forklift removes the car and dumps it on a grass lot.

Pushing further downtown we cross paths with about two hundred “direct action” folks. They even have a trance/techno soundtrack (c/o a red wagon with a stereo and “Funk the War” signs). But the mostly black wearing bandana crew seem confused as to where they’re headed.

“C’mon, this way,” yells one.

“No, this way,” shouts another, who eventually wins out.

But the confusion ends when it comes to the marchers’ intent. These folks want nothing short of destruction of the capatilist state. I’ve witnessed a few dozen riots in my day—mostly sports related—but I’ve never seen such a long, uncontested orgy of smashed windows, popped tires, trash can flipping, road blocking, and wreckage. Inigo captures a long shot of people running up the road by a big Macy’s, where a black woman sits on a bench smiling, Macy bags at her feet. Just then, two anarchists charge from behind with a metal grate. It takes a few tries, but they smash the windows.
(more…)

TAGS: 2000, 2004, Amy Goodman, beer, BOOKS, Bush, Campaign, Congress, contest, Denver, dog, Fox News, free, GOP, Gustav, Hillary, iPod, Iraq, John McCain, kids, mccain, Music, New York, New York Times, NPR, nypd, obama, political, Politics, Pregnant, Race, Rap, Republicans, RNC, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin, Shiite, Soundtrack, spin, Sports, Texas, the Replacements, Trade, Video, war, williamsburg, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

McCain on Palin’s International Experience


Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - 10:16 pm (EST)
By Hassan Chop

Here’s Charlie Gibson of ABC asking McCain about Sarah Palin’s foreign policy experience (hat tip TPM):

GIBSON: But as you know, the questions revolve really around foreign policy experience.

Can you honestly say you feel confident having someone who hasn’t traveled outside the United States until last year, dealing with an insurgent Russia, with an Iran with nuclear ambitions, with an unstable Pakistan, not to mention the war on terror?

MCCAIN: Sure. And one of the key elements of America’s national security requirements are energy. She understands the energy issues better than anybody I know in Washington, D.C., and she understands.

Alaska is right next to Russia. She understands that. Look, Sen. Obama’s never visited south of our border. I mean, please.

Sarah Palin understands that Alaska is right next to Russia. In other words, she knows how to look at a map, which, naturally, means she’s ready to lead. Meanwhile, Obama hasn’t been “south of our border.” That, of course, means he has no experience or judgment. Speaking of judgment, there’s this tidbit from the interview:

GIBSON: But you criticized, for a long time, Sen. Obama…

MCCAIN: Sure.

GIBSON: … based on his lack of experience…

MCCAIN: Sure.

GIBSON: … in your words…

MCCAIN: Yes.

GIBSON: … with the foreign policy area. Jan. 6, I’m quoting you, “Sen. Obama does not have the national security experience and background to be president.”

MCCAIN: I said he didn’t…

GIBSON: Sarah Palin does?

MCCAIN: I said that he didn’t have the judgment. He doesn’t have the judgment. He didn’t have the judgment on Iraq. He still refuses to acknowledge that the surge has succeeded.

Gov. Palin knows the surge has succeeded. She’s the commander of the Alaskan National Guard.
He said that Iran was a tiny problem. He’s never visited south of our border. He has no experience on these issues.

She has been in charge and she has had national security as one of her primary responsibilities. Sen. Obama has never had a position of responsibility to do with many of those responsibilities. I’m proud of her vision. I’m proud of her strength. And everybody knows energy is a key element in American strength and future. She knows how to address that issue.

Gibson asked about experience and McCain responded that he actually said judgment. This is yet another instance of McCain dodging something he’s actually said and is par for the course, so there’s no surprise there.

Note that McCain is a little obsessed with the fact that Obama’s never been south of the border. According to Sarah Palin’s spokesperson, she hasn’t either. She’s been to Kuwait and Germany to visit Alaskan national guard deployed overseas and to visit wounded troops. She’s also apparently been to Canada. Initially, her spokesperson said she also traveled to Ireland. It turned out that the trip to Ireland was actually a refueling stop in Shannon, Ireland (I’ve done that layover in Shannon, and you basically mill around the airport for a couple of hours and hop back on the plane). So, Senator McCain, Sarah Palin hasn’t been south of the border either. Does that mean she also lacks experience and judgment?

On Iran, Obama never said Iran was a tiny problem. That’s a flat out lie. And of course, Sarah Palin has no national security experience as commander of the Alaskan national guard. All guard deployments overseas, i.e. stuff having to do with national security, are handled by the white house.

This whole idea of foreign policy experience is a bit off the mark, of course. Plenty of would-be presidents ran for the office without any bona fide foreign policy credentials. However, the reason this is an issue is because McCain has run on his experience throughout this campaign and deried Obama’s lack of experience. The fact that McCain chose a running mate with no experience to be a heartbeat from the presidency shows that McCain doesn’t consider experience to be important, i.e. he knew all along his whole argument against Obama was BS. This was a last-minute political decision to rev up the base, attract female voters (polls show it’s not working, yet), and cement McCain as a maverick. It has nothing to do with the experience and judgment that McCain apparently considers to be so important. Most importantly, it shows that McCain has terrible, terrible judgment.

TAGS: Campaign, Interview, Iran, Iraq, mccain, NATO, obama, political, Poll, polls, russia, Sarah Palin, Travel, war

RELATED POSTS:

Hillary


Wednesday, August 27, 2008 - 9:07 pm (EST)
By a.p.

demconvention.com

Waiting for the inevitable spectacle of Bill, considering Hillary…

OK, so I’m still a bit bitter that Obama / Clinton couldn’t bury the hatchet enough to get her a ticket invite.  And I’m also peeved at Budget Clinton’s antics in the close down of the primary race — she said some things she shouldn’t have, and she handed the Republicans a couple loaded guns.  Though ultimately, let’s be honest — so did Biden.  It’s politics — the GOP can and will spin it into oblivion…along with everything else.  We should take care to not follow suit.

And, as a further caveat, I could never wholeheartedly back Clinton for the top spot on the ticket, as oligarchies really freak me out (go figure).  But that’s of no consequence here.

What does matter at the moment is that, last night, Clinton proved why she was such a contender in the first place — not for her relations with a former President, but for her own skills as an orator, leader, and politician.  I may not make friends in some circles with a statement like that, but those are pretty pedantic circles anyway.

Admittedly, the speech intermittently threatened to tumble into self-aggrandizement (which the Democrats needed like I need my ex-girlfriend’s status updates), but she managed to steer clear of an egregious error — recognizing her own accomplishments, embracing her millions of supporters, and promptly pushing and connecting that phenomenal energy straight over to Obama based on the issues (while getting in a few effective digs at McCain).  She didn’t address her prior attacks on Obama point-by-point — or that ad of McCain’s that uses her words — but she made it pretty fucking clear that a McCain presidency would be a disaster, and that Obama was the only way to ride… ’nuff said as far as I’m concerned.

Again, this is politics — she doesn’t need to paint him as the second coming, she needs to outline the case for his presidency.  And she did just that.  Let sleeping dogs lie on the personal front.

In the process, she cemented her position as a matriarch of both the Democratic party and the women’s movement in general (if she wasn’t both already), but she did it with a strange grace and style that left me feeling like she was just up there doing us all a favor.

Also, as an aside, Hillary was back in the character that she has historically been known and loved for.  Gone was the scheming and pandering of a desperate candidate on the stump — the overly placating and phony presentation of a woman dancing awkwardly between an air of disbelief at imminent failure and a tenuous hope in some sort of inevitable triumph.  And thank god she got that out of her system.

The best news?  The Democratic party came out of the primary season with not one but two powerhouses.

demconvention.comWatch her slide from a whole load of “I’m awesome, thanks” over to “Barack Obama for President”:

“I ran for president to renew the promise of America. To rebuild the middle class and sustain the American Dream, to provide the opportunity to work hard and have that work rewarded, to save for college, a home and retirement, to afford the gas and groceries and still have a little left over each month.

To promote a clean energy economy that will create millions of green collar jobs.

To create a health care system that is universal, high quality, and affordable so that parents no longer have to choose between care for themselves or their children or be stuck in dead end jobs simply to keep their insurance.

To create a world class education system and make college affordable again.

To fight for an America defined by deep and meaningful equality — from civil rights to labor rights, from women’s rights to gay rights, from ending discrimination to promoting unionization to providing help for the most important job there is: caring for our families. To help every child live up to his or her God-given potential.

To make America once again a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws.

To bring fiscal sanity back to Washington and make our government an instrument of the public good, not of private plunder.

To restore America’s standing in the world, to end the war in Iraq, bring our troops home and honor their service by caring for our veterans.

And to join with our allies to confront our shared challenges, from poverty and genocide to terrorism and global warming.

Most of all, I ran to stand up for all those who have been invisible to their government for eight long years.

Those are the reasons I ran for president. Those are the reasons I support Barack Obama. And those are the reasons you should too.”

Welcome back, Hill.  And thanks.

YouTube Preview Image

TAGS: attack, Barack Obama, dog, economy, global warming, GOP, Hillary, Iraq, mccain, obama, Politics, Race, Republicans, spin, Vice, war, youtube

RELATED POSTS:

Depressing


Tuesday, August 26, 2008 - 2:35 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

shit…BBC:

A 13-year-old girl wearing a vest packed with explosives has been arrested in the Iraqi town of Baquba, after turning herself in - according to US officials.

She allegedly surrendered to police in Baquba and they had to remove the vest before detaining her. Iraqi police released a video of the incident. A US military spokesman said she apparently approached the Iraqi police saying she had the vest on and did not want to go through with it. But it was not clear if she had been forced to wear the vest or had done so voluntarily.

TAGS: Iraq, Video

RELATED POSTS:

Teddy


Monday, August 25, 2008 - 11:05 pm (EST)
By Geoff Kenyon

Chris Mathhews opened the night telling a story about a 9 year old Teddy on the night his brother Jack (JFK) won the congressional race in Mass. Matthews said that a young Kennedy raised his glass at the table and before anyone else acknowledged the elephant in the room…his eldest deceased brother…and said, “I would like to offer a toast to the brother who is not here…to Joe.”

He was then introduced by the beautiful Caroline Kennedy who seems to be able to rise above politics… or maybe I am just saying that because she is one of the few women involved in politics who is sexy. Caroline introduced “Uncle Teddy” as a Senator of not just Massachusetts, but a Sen. to all those who care about cool things such as racial equality, universal health care, and peace.

A Ken Burns viedo then featured a young Teddy claiming “As long as I have a voice in the US Senate, its going to be for the Democratic platform pledge that provides descent quality health care for all north south east and west for all America as a matter of right and not a privilege.”

The video then went on to talk to a father whose son died in 2003 in Iraq because of his unarmored Humvee …”Senator Kennedy had been a Gold Star family before I was born ….he remembers where his mother was where his father was when they came to tell them that his brother Joe was killed.” …If you count his other brothers who died for political purposes it is hard to think of a man who has paid more in the form of US Politics on the national stage.

After this stirring intro Teddy, looking the part of an old man, limped out onto the stage to pledge that he would be present in the Senate in January, his family glowing in the stands.

During the speech the cameras were fixed on a proud and enthusiastic Biden who stood and clapped at every punch line.  Especially when Teddy pronounced “Barrack Obama will be a commander in chief who understands that young Americans in uniform must never be committed to a mistake but always to a mission worthy of their bravery.”…remember Biden has a son serving in Iraq.

It was a great moment in American politics for nerds like me, and maybe the last great Kennedy moment of our lives.

 

TAGS: Congress, Iraq, NATO, nerds, obama, political, Politics, Race, Video

RELATED POSTS:

DNC Baby. Political Round Up…


Monday, August 25, 2008 - 1:25 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Denver!!!

I love the Obama font. And Michelle’s looking good…

OMG He’s Black!!!
Slate noticed Obama is black. In a story sub-headed “RACISM IS THE ONLY REASON MCCAIN MIGHT BEAT HIM,” Jacob Wesiberg, Slate’s eic, states the obvious. Duh. A black dude with a middle name of Hussein is running against an Irish John and it took Slate 19-months to write the obligatory Holy Shit This Guy is Black story? I love Slate. But they’ve sucked lately. Georgia’s war didn’t get any coverage. They haven’t run much from Afghanistan. And they’re election stuff has been 2nd tier. Where’s Meghan O’Rourke? Hopefully at the DNC.

Bubba Factor
Are the Clintons trying to steal the DNC? Politico thinks so (and Drudge leads with it). Tensions Boil, reads the headline:

One flashpoint is the assigned speech topic for former president Bill Clinton, who is scheduled to speak Wednesday night, when the convention theme is “Securing America’s Future.” The night’s speakers will argue that Obama would be a more effective commander in chief than his Republican rival, Sen. John McCain (Ariz.).

The former president is disappointed, associates said, because he is eager to speak about the economy and more broadly about Democratic ideas —emphasizing the contrast between the Bush years and his own record in the 1990s.

The Clintons are the non-story of the week…

All About Joe
Everyone in America is eager to learn about Joe Biden, O’s veep. His book, Promises to Keep (Random House 2007), is now a bestseller:

As of Sunday afternoon, the book was at No. 31 on the amazon.com bestseller list, and No. 11 on Barnes & Noble’s list.

It’s 24 on the Amazon list right now.

I’ve seen Biden speak on a hand-full of occasions. Most notably, I saw him at a foreign policy luncheon at the Kennedy Museum during the 2004 Boston DNC. Biden sat on a panel with Madeline Albright and Iraq’s deputy PM, among others. This was when Iraq was in the midst of a two-front uprising. On Iraq, Biden was fluid though a little over state-y.

At the time, rumblings of an 08 Biden run were abuzz, but the two foreign affairs junkies with me were convinced he’d be a great Sec State but not Prez material. I never considered him for VP. But what a great choice. Biden’s funny, can be a dick, and knows his stuff. Considering he lost his wife and child at 29, ascending to the second highest office in the land to serve in their honor makes me happy as a little girl who got a pony for her b day.

TNR Kisses Lizza’s Ass
The New Republic says 2008’s best political profile was Making It: How Chicago Shaped Obama by The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza. Of course, Lizza used to work for TNR. Unfortunately, his piece, while long and in-depth, glossed over much of Obama’s Chicago rise. For a better portrait of O’s Chicago days, buy David Mendell’s Promise to Power.

Reading Lizza’s piece, you could tell he was practicing access journalism. I felt like Axelrod was living in his brain, revising history. Most specifically, Lizza glosses over O and Michelle’s ties to real estate developers like Valerie Jarrett, Allsyon Davis, and Tony Rezko. Jarrett is who got the Obamas into politics (luring Michelle to city hall in the 80s). It was Jarrett, Rezko, and Davis who gave O his initial $$$ for his state senate run.

These folks are also (in)famous in Chicago for pushing private-public housing partnerships. Yes: in the early-90s, Chicago’s public housing authority was a mess. And these Jarrett-Rezko-Obama private-public policies made sense, at the time. What doesn’t make sense is why so many of the public units Jarrett ran (as CEO of Habitat INC, a title she holds today) went to shit under her watch. Or how Rezko took $40 million plus in federal tax credits, ran complexes into the ground, then moved into condo development with the dough he earned. A high number of the units owned by these folks are now back in public hands. Weirder still, Obama continues to support these policies without modifications even though they failed.

For all the right wing media’s attacks, Obama’s housing policy—which has left thousands of poor blacks negatively affected—has been left largely untouched. Valerie Jarrett is hated by blacks on the South Side. She’s #3 or 4 in the Obama campaign. Yet she’s only received minimal—and glowing—coverage. Why? You can’t Swift Boat a guy for fucking over the very poor blacks that white GOP assholes love fucking over. If anything, Obama’s questionable South Side housing record would help him with the Swift crowd.

Happy DNC viewing everyone…

TAGS: 2004, attack, Bill Clinton, BOOKS, Boston, Bush, Denver, economy, election, georgia, GOP, Iraq, Joe Biden, John McCain, mccain, New York, obama, political, Politics, Racism, war

RELATED POSTS:

Open Letter to Vice Magazine


Friday, August 22, 2008 - 11:04 am (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Wah, wah, Vice is suspeneding their letters section because they don’t get enought real letters:

No letters page this month. You know why? Because we aren’t receiving enough real letters. We mainly get emails now, and people don’t think when they write emails.

Then Vice goes on to decry technology, like something out of a Delillo novel from 82. But maybe the problem isn’t email or technology, it’s Vice itself. Maybe Vice gets dumb letters because of its legacy as a really, really dumb magazine.

Vice Magazine hit its zenith in 2001, right after 9/11, when everyone on earth wanted to know what it felt like to be young and vulnerable in downtown NYC. Back then Vice was a crude, honest, and pure reflection of the coked-out Billburg/LES axis of sleaze. No magazine had ever so perfectly mixed art with ignorance.

Around 2003, when Vice fever peaked, the magazine had a grand opportunity to become more than a post-puberal text. By this point, Vice had almost single-handedly redefined fashion and art photography. Its aesthetic and image were so cool, so New York, that the company’s marketing arm exploded—and seemingly every booze and shoe were re-branded by Vicers.

2003 was also the year Bush and co illegally invaded Iraq under false pretense. It was the year America began it’s decline from hyper- to merely super-power. What did Vice do? Nothing. Instead of using its new $$$ to become a real magazine, covering real events, Vice kept on pushing tits, drugs, and farts.

It wasn’t until 2006 or so that Vice woke up and realized the world was on fire. They did a cool story on Bin Laden, written by an AP correspondent. They publsihed an Iraq issue. They started a TV network, VBS, that did “gonzo” reporting on poison frogs and politics. But it was too late. No one took them seriously. And by the time Vice’s first film, Heavy Metal in Baghdad, was released this year (complete with Converse co-branding), Vice had pretty much lost it’s cultural capital. That’s a shame because Vice has done a lot of great work in the last few years. But by failing to cover that crucial moment in American life, circa 03-04, when the country really went mad (kaos in Iraq, Abu Ghraib, Bush Redux) Vice missed it’s chance to transcend farts and become authoritative journalistic documentarians. And that’s why they continually get stupid letters. 

 

TAGS: Bush, converse, dog, Drugs, Iraq, New York, Politics, Vice, Vice Magazine

RELATED POSTS:

Pipe Dreams Over the “Gateway of Tears”


Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 10:49 am (EST)
By Jeff


Trust us...Djibouti will look like Fiji! \

Inside a half-finished five star hotel in Djibouti this past July, several hundred foreign dignitaries, investors and journalists gathered for the first look at an ambitious plan to unite continents. Dubai-based Al Noor Holding Investment Company hopes to build a bridge — to be the world’s largest suspension structure, at points boasting 800-meters-tall pilings — between Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. The bridge, spanning 29 kilometers of the Red Sea between Djibouti and Yemen, will be anchored by brand new cities on each side bearing the same name, Al Noor City, or City of Light. The estimated cost of the whole venture is somewhere around $200 billion. The visionary of this project, Tarek bin Laden, Saudi oligarch and brother-in-law of the notorious Osama, hopes in 15 to 20 years time to see his dream of the bridge and both cities become reality. But just how realistic is it?

Perhaps Djibouti’s only real asset today is its location at the junction of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. It has one of Africa’s smallest populations, estimated at around 500,000, and its land size is comparable to the US state of Massachusetts. It is also bordered by Ethiopia, Eritrea and Somalia — three nations who are embroiled in multiple conflicts and whose names have long generated images of famine, despotism and anarchy.

Along the road between the Djibouti-Ambouli Airport and the hotel hosting the project launch, people wandered between single-storey concrete buildings and shacks — some carried jerrycans or bundles of sticks, but most walked empty handed. Less than a kilometer away from the hotel, a naked child squatted beside a wall while groups of shirtless men slept in ditches beneath the shade of trees.

The “Bridge of the Horn” is to have a six-lane highway and three light rail lines for passenger and commercial traffic, with a goal of one day handling 100,000 cars and 20,000 rail passengers per day. There are also plans for a natural gas pipeline to run the length of the bridge from Djibouti into Yemen and onto the Persian Gulf.

If completed, the bridge will cross the aptly named Bab el Mandeb, the Gateway of Tears. It is the shortest point between Yemen and Djibouti and is named after the treacherous waters made famous for centuries of taking ships and lives. There is also the deadly threat of Somali pirates operating in the area, enough to warrant the permanent basing of an international pirate task force and several thousand French Foreign Legion and US military troops. Europe’s supply of oil from the Gulf passes through these straits making security here all the more vital.

And just as the Suez Canal controls sea traffic at the northern end of the Red Sea, the Gateway of Tears owns the shipping lanes of the south. Not far from the hotel there was a sight common to every port city from Buenos Aires to Shanghai: shipping containers. Stacked like a multi-colored set of Legos, rows of metal boxes waited to be filled with goods, loaded onto ships and sent out across the globe. This is the Horn of Africa. (more…)

TAGS: 2000, attack, economy, free, HBO, insurgents, Iran, Iraq, Islam, long island, model, Muslim, NPR, Pirates, Schools, Singapore, Slam, Suspension, Trade, Travel, Vice, Video, war

RELATED POSTS:

Biden: “I’m not the guy”


Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 6:26 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

Whoah! Oh the suspense. Joe Biden says he’s not VP. The Page:

As the Delaware Senator leaves his home in Wilmington Tuesday, he tells reporters camped out outside hoping for a veep announcement:

“You guys have got better things to do, I’m not the guy.”

Much of the national press thought Biden was a lock. Still, I can’t see Obama naming Bayh, a pro-Iraq former Clintonista, or Kaine, who is too ugly.

The announcement will come Friday, most likely followed by a joint appearance in Springfield, IL, where Obama announced his candidacy in 2007.

CBS News has confirmed that Barack Obama’s campaign now plans to announce Obama’s vice presidential choice to supporters via email and text message on Friday afternoon. (This plan could change, of course.)

In other news…What exactly is an official pre-premier party? Could this be the best worst party of the summer? It’s at least the best bad flyer…And you know I’ll be there.

TAGS: Barack Obama, Iraq, Joe Biden, NATO, obama, Politics, Race, Vice, war

RELATED POSTS:

UK Discovers Hipsters, AD 2008


Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 5:34 pm (EST)
By Ray LeMoine

No pictures needed. I’ve highlighted key findings in this dispatch from The Independent UK:

The bewildered boy clutches his fruit salad and searches for a seat at the back of the bar. He’s wearing a vintage flannel shirt and skinny jeans, a pair of pointed brogues and pink plastic-framed sunglasses. His hair is a peroxide crop in the androgynous, Agyness Deyn style. This hipper-than-thou hangout in the Truman Brewery on London’s Brick Lane, with its indistinct electronic soundtrack, is a popular spot. Emos, nu-folkies and post-post-punks mingle on Moroccan-style cushions. A guy in a ripped white V-neck T-shirt is stretched out on the leather couch in the corner, his face lit by the pale glow from his MacBook. For an aspiring scenester like the boy in the flannel shirt, standing out from the crowd is going to be a struggle.

We’re in the crucible of London cool, a district so packed with poseurs that it attracts as many satirists as it does followers of fashion. But forget any tired talk simply of Shoreditch twats and Brooklyn hipsters. Across the developed world, from Copenhagen to Cape Town, from Tokyo to Sao Paolo, from Kreuzberg to Williamsburg – from Grangemouth to Guildford, for that matter – today’s scenesters all wear the same clothes and accessories, listen to the same sounds, ride the same bicycles, and read the same magazines, e-mailouts and style blogs.

“There always used to be a particular city that was the centre of cool at a particular point in time,” says Ted Polhemus, style anthropologist and author of Streetstyle: From Sidewalk to Catwalk. “But now there’s no longer a place where it’s ‘at’; there’s no longer any centre of the world’s popular cultural universe. For a time it seemed it would be a simple matter of shifting from London to Tokyo. But instead, street style is everywhere and in places you’d never have guessed it would be.”

The Truman Brewery is a microcosm of an international phenomenon. Across the alley from the bar, Rough Trade East – London’s coolest independent record store – is celebrating its first birthday with a limited edition run of Rough Trade-branded Converse All Stars, the global scenester’s shoe of choice. Next door, there’s a hairdresser cutting the “do” of the day, its clients reclining in Japanese Belmont Cadilla styling chairs “for ultra-comfort and design”.

There’s the local scooter dealership with a rank of Mod-ish Italian Vespas lined up on the pavement outside. And at the end of the row is a clothing store that specialises in stitching together two old pieces of clothing to make something new. Want your pinstripe suit grafted to a hoodie? This is the place for you. And this is what global scenester culture has come to in the Noughties – a succession of styles from the past half-century, patched together to form a single, strangely familiar whole. There’s a bit of Eurotrash here, some British punk there, a swatch of Asian minimalism, and a sizeable off-cut of blue-collar chic from both sides of the Atlantic. So how, exactly, did hip get globalised?

Like every other American Apparel clothing store worldwide, the East End branch – a stone’s throw from the Truman Brewery – stocks Spandex hotpants and sequined tube dresses, white Eighties gym socks and DayGlo sports sweats, maroon corduroys worthy of Woodstock, even the latest album by French electro-auteur Sébastien Tellier. The shop is so popular it’s moving to bigger premises.

American Apparel is an archetype for the globalisation of “cool”. The retail chain was founded in California in 1997 with an outsider ethic. Most of its clothes are produced in an 800,000-square foot factory in Los Angeles, and its Canadian founder, Dov Charney, actively associates his brand with the city’s multicultural melting pot.

Today, American Apparel is the largest domestic clothing manufacturer in the US, and boasts around 200 stores worldwide – in Canada, Mexico, Israel, Japan, Korea and most of Western Europe. There are outlets in Glasgow, Brighton and Liverpool, and the locations of its London branches read like a historical tour of capital cool: Portobello Road, Carnaby Street, Covent Garden, Camden. The further its global reach stretches, the more easily the company can study and copy street style, before repackaging it and selling it back to the originators of that style, with an American Apparel label attached.

Uniqlo, the Japanese clothing giant, is another outfitter of the global scenester. Until 2004, the chain was known as a cheap and nasty Asian C&A equivalent. Its first move into the UK, in the early Noughties, met with little success. So Uniqlo executives went back to the drawing board and hired top creative director Kashiwa Sato to transform its fortunes.

Sato’s strategy was to make Uniqlo a global brand, but one unafraid of flaunting its modern Japanese origins. Now the company’s website is world class, its store interiors sleek and minimalist, its global logo (in both Roman and Japanese script) ubiquitous, and its clothing cutting edge and inclusive. Today, Uniqlo has almost 800 stores worldwide, including outlets in the UK, US and France. What Sato was looking to replicate, he recently told Creative Review, was “the ultra-contemporary cool aspect of Japan, its pop culture rather than something traditional and Japanese-y.” He’d tapped into the global scene.

Down the street from American Apparel, past the London College of Fashion, is The Old Blue Last, a shabby-chic pub where Vice magazine, style bible to the global scenester, hosts regular parties. Outside, a blackboard advertises “fuzzed garage, punk, post-punk, freakbeat and more in an anything goes night of really GOOD music”.

Once, style tribes defined themselves by their music. There were disco divas, electro heads, hippy West Coast rockers…. But in the age of the MP3, anything really does go: Parisian lounge jazz bands can cover the Ramones (as did Nouvelle Vague); Belgian producers can make a Kylie Minogue song sound like The Prodigy (as did Soulwax); and DJs can drop The White Stripes into a hip-hop set – Mark Ronson made his name on the New York club circuit doing just that.

Today’s music scene is a global swapshop. One of the coming bands of this year, for instance, are Johannesburg’s Blk Jks, whose style choices include the global scenester’s familiar Elvis Costello “dork” glasses, 1970s ski vests, vintage Nikes and, yes, skinny jeans.

The band that defined the US branch of the global scene was The Strokes, a quintet of monied Manhattanites posing as Lower East Side hipsters. Lead singer Julian Casablancas’s vocal persona is insouciant, unimpressed, too cool to try harder. His latest project is the song “My Drive Thru”, commissioned for a Converse advertisement; the ad is the centrepiece of Converse Century, a celebration of the company’s first 100 years, and a smart marketing campaign that condenses decades of global youth subculture and rebrands it for the mainstream.

The print element of the Converse Century campaign features a row of international, intergenerational scenesters, each wearing their pair of Chuck Taylor All Star trainers – among them are Hunter S Thompson, James Dean and Sid Vicious. The UK version of the print ad features Joy Division’s Ian Curtis; the French version, actress and singer Jane Birkin; the Chinese version, singer-songwriter Cui Jian. Converse means cool in more than 20 languages.

When the first edition of the glossy freesheet Vice came out in Montreal in 1994, its founders could hardly have believed that, 14 years on, it would be sought out by 900,000 readers on five continents. Now, the Vice empire includes a clothing chain, a record label and an online TV channel.

The Vice aesthetic has had an abiding influence on global scenester style. The magazine’s photographers popularised a street-verité photographic vernacular, with touches of soft porn and a sense of menace. The Vice Photo Book, a collection published earlier this year, boasts images of guns, sex, drug-taking, blood and vomit.

It’s no coincidence that American Apparel’s often controversial advertising campaigns imitate the Vice look, nor that Vice photographer Terry Richardson is the principal photographer for Uniqlo’s in-house magazine, Paper. His style has countless amateur copycats worldwide, whose photos have found a home on fast-growing photo-sharing websites such as Flickr and MySpace. Snapping away at a party in Portland, Oregon, or in Harajuku, Tokyo, a global scenester can disseminate their local style worldwide before sunrise.

“People like Ryan McGinley and Terry Richardson just took pictures of their friends on basic cameras,R